Enforcing jurisdiction
Greece · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 65/2022 – Complaint Upheld (Greece, 2022)

Complaint Upheld
Hellenic Data Protection Authority20 December 2022Greece
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A polling company failed to respond to a person's request for access to a recorded phone conversation, leading to a complaint. The Greek Data Protection Authority found that the company did not fulfill its obligation to provide information. This case serves as a reminder for companies to have proper procedures for handling access requests.

What happened

The polling company did not respond to an individual's access request for a recorded conversation.

Who was affected

The individual who participated in the phone call with the polling company.

What the authority found

The Greek Data Protection Authority determined that the company violated GDPR by not responding to the access request.

Why this matters

This case highlights the need for companies to establish clear processes for handling requests for personal data. Businesses should ensure they are prepared to respond to such requests promptly.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 58 GDPR
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 12(4) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 12(4) GDPR
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 51(GDPR)
Art. 55(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In this case an individual, the data subject, who had taken part in a phone call with a polling company, the controller, submitted an access request (Article 15 GDPR) to obtain a copy of the recorded conversation. The company did not respond to her request and, subsequently, she filed a complaint with the Greek DPA. When asked to provide submissions to the DPA, the controller responded to the complaint by stating, firstly, that it is not a commercial sales company and therefore does not record conversations or collect personal data in any way. Secondly, they explained that they have a three-month period for which they keep personal data on their files and so, had there been any collection of the data as suggested, it would have been deleted. The company also speculated that the subject’s access request (submitted via email) probably ended up in a “pile of unwanted corporate correspondence”. Issuing its decision, the DPA acknowledged the two arguments put forward by the controller. In response to both of these claims, the authority held that “the controller is not released from its obligation to inform the data subject merely because the data in question does not exist in a file kept by [them]”.  Therefore, as the company did not respond to the data subject’s request in any way, they had violated Article 12 and 15 GDPR. The decision also found that the investigation, and the controller’s comments, demonstrated that the company does not appear to have any methods in place to deal with these sorts of requests. Regarding the exercise of corrective powers, the DPA observed that the effects of the infringement were de minimis, that the company did not derive any benefit from it, and that there are have been no prior infringements by the controller. Therefore, in accordance with Article 58 GDPR, the DPA issued a reprimand to the controller, and imposed an order instructing the company to establish, within two months from the receipt of this notice, procedures to ensure t

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 65/2022 in GR

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

20 December 2022

Authority

Hellenic Data Protection Authority

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5707

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 65/2022 - Greece (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: