Enforcing jurisdiction
Belgium · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 19/2023 – Complaint Upheld (Belgium, 2023)

Complaint Upheld
Autorité de Protection des Données3 March 2023Belgium
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A person in Belgium asked a company for access to their personal data but received no response. The Belgian Data Protection Authority found that the company failed to help the person access their data in a timely manner, which is important for people's rights to know what information is held about them.

What happened

A person requested access to their personal data but did not receive a response from the company.

Who was affected

The person who requested access to their personal data from the company.

What the authority found

The Belgian DPA ruled that the company did not respond to the access request in time, violating the rules about providing access to personal data.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of timely responses to access requests. Companies must ensure they have processes in place to handle such requests properly.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 12 GDPR
Art. 15 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 15(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 58 LCA
Art. 60 LCA
Art. 62 LCA
Art. 95 § 2 LCA

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 7 September 2022, a data subject sent a request of access to his data and requested a copy of it, pursuant to Article 15 GDPR. The data subject then proceeded to send a second email after not receiving any response from the controller. His email received no response yet again. On 22 November 2022, the data subject lodged a complaint with the Belgian DPA. Following the Belgian DPA’s recommendations, the data subject sent an email to another of the controller’s email addresses on 19 January 2023. One month later, there was still no reply. The Belgian DPA held that the controller may have violated Article 12 GDPR and Article 15 GDPR for having failed to facilitate the exercise of the data subject’s right of access in a timely manner and no later than one month from the time the request was received, or to give the data subject a reason for its impossibility to do so. Thus, the Belgian DPA ordered the controller to comply with the data subject’s request of access and to provide him with a copy of his data. It ordered the controller to respond to future requests of data subjects to exercise their rights, and finally ordered the controller to inform the DPA by e-mail of the outcome of this decision.

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 19/2023 in BE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

3 March 2023

Authority

Autorité de Protection des Données

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5730

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 19/2023 - Belgium (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: