Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 2020-0.829.566 – Dismissed (Austria, 2021)

Dismissed
Datenschutzbehörde23 March 2021Austria
final
Dismissed

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian religious organization publicly announced that a member was expelled, leading the member to claim their personal data was mishandled. This case is significant because it shows that religious organizations have a lot of freedom in how they handle internal matters, which can limit individuals' rights under data protection laws.

What happened

A religious community publicly declared a member's expulsion, which the member claimed involved unlawful processing of their personal data.

Who was affected

The individual who was expelled from the religious community.

What the authority found

The authority ruled it had no power to review the internal decisions of the religious organization regarding the public announcement of the expulsion.

Why this matters

This case illustrates the balance between personal privacy rights and the autonomy of religious organizations. It serves as a reminder for individuals to be aware of how their data may be used in such contexts.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 17 GDPR
Art. 21 GDPR
Art. 15(3) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 15(3) GDPR
Art. 17(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject was active member of a religious community. They also held an official spiritual role within the church. After many years of service, an internal committee held that data subject committed a serious sin and publicly declared that they were no longer a member of the community. The data subject claimed that by this public announcement the controller unlawfully processed their personal data. The data subject also requested access and erasure of some personal data and objected to the processing. The controller claimed that data were processed pursuant to Articles 6(1)(c) and (f) and 9(2)(d) and (f) GDPR. Moreover, a religious organisation enjoys a high degree of autonomy in accordance with the European Convention of Human Rights and the European Treaties. The processing at issue fell therefore outside the State’s competence. The controller also stated to have fully replied to the access request. The data subject claimed that at the time of their baptism they were only 13 and therefore not able to understand all the legal implications of the affiliation for their right to data protection. They also claimed that it would have been sufficient to bring their expulsion to the attention of only two people, without any need for a public announcement. Thus, the data subject lodged a complaint. The Austrian DPA held to have no competence to review “internal matters” of a religious organisation, such as the decision to disclose information about the data subject’s expulsion during a public gathering of the church. For the same reason, the Austrian DPA denied that Article 15 GDPR was applicable. Moreover, in an obiter dictum, the data subject’s claim that information provided was incomplete was rejected. According to the DPA, Article 15(3) GDPR does not give a data subject the right to request entire documents, such as cover and reference letters or the full assessment of someone’s “spiritual status”. It is sufficient that the controller provides the data subj

Outcome

Dismissed

The complaint or investigation was dismissed.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 2020-0.829.566 in AT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

23 March 2021

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-6106

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 2020-0.829.566 - Austria (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: