DPA case 06/SIU/2018 – Violation Found (Ireland, 2023)

Violation Found
Data Protection Commission22 August 2023Ireland
final
Violation Found

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Irish data protection authority investigated Galway County Council's use of surveillance technologies like CCTV and body cameras. They found that the council's use of these technologies did not always comply with data protection laws. This inquiry highlights the need for public authorities to ensure their surveillance practices respect individuals' privacy rights.

What happened

The Irish data protection authority examined the surveillance practices of Galway County Council, including CCTV and body cameras.

Who was affected

The residents and individuals whose data might be captured by the council's surveillance technologies.

What the authority found

The authority determined that the council's use of surveillance technologies did not always meet GDPR requirements for lawful processing.

Why this matters

This investigation underscores the importance of transparency and compliance in surveillance practices by public authorities. Organizations must ensure their data collection methods align with privacy laws.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 24(1) GDPR
Art. 24(2) GDPR
Art. 35(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 24(GDPR)
Art. 35(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Irish DPC started an own volition inquiry into processing operations carried out by the Galway County Council (the controller), focusing mainly into the surveillance technologies deployed by state authorities, including the Galway County Council and by the An Garda Síochána (the Irish police). More specifically, the Galway County Council Officials make use of CCTV systems, body-worn cameras and automated number plate recognition (ANPR) technologies for various purposes including law enforcement purposes. The DPC carried out its assessment both on the basis of the GDPR and of the [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016L0680 Law Enforcement Directive (LED)] for activities meant to prevent, investigate, detect and prosecute crime or for the execution of criminal penalties. In its inquiry, the DPC assessed the legitimacy of processing activities by the controller in light of both the GDPR and the Irish Data Protection Act and the LED, as different processing activities pursued different purposes. The DPC held with respect to body-worn cameras and ANPR systems that the GDPR applies to these processing activities as they mainly serve health and safety and traffic management purposes respectively, thus no law enforcement purposes. Making reference to the strict interpretation in CJEU jurisprudence, the DPC held that in order for a processing activity to fall under the scope of the LED, it must be specifically and concretely used for law enforcement purposes and it does not suffice that the data could potentially (emphasis added) be processed for law enforcement purposes. Firstly, as regards ANPR cameras used for traffic management, the DPC held that the latter enable identification of data subjects within the vehicle and thus constitutes processing of personal data. The legal basis referred to by the Council is Article 6(1)(e) GDPR. The DPC held that processing ex Article 6(1)(e) GDPR, read in light of Article 6(3) GDPR and Recital 41

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 06/SIU/2018 in IE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

22 August 2023

Authority

Data Protection Commission

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-6296

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 06/SIU/2018 - Ireland (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: