Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

DPA case 2022-0.021.739 – Violation Found (Austria, 2022)

Violation Found
Datenschutzbehörde1 March 2022Austria
final
Violation Found

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian authority found that a company improperly used GPS trackers on its vehicles to monitor employees' private trips. This decision is crucial for businesses that use tracking technology, as it sets limits on employee monitoring.

What happened

The company installed GPS trackers on vehicles to monitor both business and private use without proper justification.

Who was affected

Employees of the company who were tracked by the GPS devices on their vehicles.

What the authority found

The authority determined that the company violated data protection rules by not having a valid reason for tracking employees' private activities.

Why this matters

This ruling highlights the need for companies to have clear and lawful reasons for monitoring employees. It serves as a warning that excessive surveillance can lead to legal consequences.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In December 2019, the DSB received an anonymous submission claiming that a controller had installed GPS-trackers on its company vehicles, monitoring not only business trips but also private rides of the its employees. Further, the complaint stated that the controller would create an employee profile based on such data. Accordingly, the DSB started an ex officio investigation under Article 57(1)(h) GDPR and obtained evidence about the following facts: the controller leased 15 company vehicles from a leasing provider and put them at its employees’ disposal for both business and private trips. In 2020, the controller asked a third party company to install a GPS-tracking device on every vehicle. Initially, this was used to determine the current location of the vehicle when asked; from July 2021 onwards, the GPS-system has also been used as a tool for keeping record of working hours, business trips and for calculating travel expenses. The device placed on the vehicles transmits data to a server and is activated by starting the car’s engine and it is deactivated as the engine stops. However, each car also includes a switch allowing the driver to deactivate the device manually. The transmitted data includes: covered distance in km, date and time, starting point, destination and location data of the vehicle (and the actual route covered). The controller has knowledge about some of this data (the address of, arrival and departure from the customers’ premises) thanks to the coordinators who organize business trips and assign them to the employees on a daily basis, hence without the need to access the data collected by the tracking devices. In order to access to the data generated by the tracking devices, one must log into a software app. The only employees who have these credentials are those responsible for payroll accounting and financial management and the coordinators. Externally, the company that installed the devices, as a processor, also has access to such data. The

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 2022-0.021.739 in AT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

1 March 2022

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-6316

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 2022-0.021.739 - Austria (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: