Enforcing jurisdiction
Hungary · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case 7286-1/2023 – Complaint Upheld (Hungary, 2023)

Complaint Upheld
Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság2 August 2023Hungary
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Hungarian recruiter failed to respond to a job seeker's request for information about how they obtained his contact details. The DPA found that the recruiter did not adequately address the job seeker's concerns. This case shows that companies must respond to data access requests promptly.

What happened

The Hungarian DPA upheld a complaint against a recruiter for not responding to a job seeker's request for information.

Who was affected

The job seeker who was contacted by the recruiter without understanding how they got his email address.

What the authority found

The DPA determined that the recruiter violated GDPR by not responding to the job seeker's access request under Article 15.

Why this matters

This ruling highlights the importance of transparency and communication for companies handling personal data. Recruiters must ensure they respond to inquiries about data usage.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 15(GDPR)
Art. 15(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 07 April 2022, the data subject received an e-mail from a recruiter, the controller, mentioning the data subject’s standout resume among job seekers’ profiles. It was unclear to the data subject how the controller obtained access to his contact information as he never disclosed it on the jobseeker’ website which is generally used by the recruiters to directly contact the candidates. Therefore, data subject asked the controller for an explanation based on Article 15 GDPR. Despite reminders, no response was received. The data subject requested the DPA to investigate the controller’s conduct and compel them to respond. Additionally, the data subject requested to investigate the relationship between the website operator and the recruiter and whether a joint liability could be established. The controller declared to the DPA that they were registered on the jobseekers’ website as an independent data controller to carry out recruitment activities. Additionally, the data subject provided his consent to be contacted for recruitment purposes on the website. The controller had access to the data subject's e-mail address as a subscriber to the website. The controller attributed the lack of response to the data subject's request to an administrative error, specifically, the misspelling of their email address in the response sent on 17 May 2022. This oversight came to light subsequent to the order from the DPA to address the allegations. The DPA held that the controller’s argument did not relieve them of their liability as a controller under Article 4(7) GDPR. The DPA highlighted that the most important characteristic of a controller is that they have substantive decision-making power and responsibility for compliance with all the obligations of the processing laid down in the GDPR. Despite the fact that controller intended to comply with the data subject’s access request under Article 15 GDPR, the DPA observed that this provision was violated. The controller sent the re

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 7286-1/2023 in HU

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

2 August 2023

Authority

Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-7714

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 7286-1/2023 - Hungary (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: