DPA case TSV/224/2023 – Violation Found (Finland, 2024)

Violation Found
DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu19 February 2024Finland
final
Violation Found

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A first aid training provider was found to have made it difficult for a person to access their personal data. The Finnish Data Protection Authority ruled that the provider's identification process was too strict and not reasonable. This ruling serves as a reminder for businesses to make it easier for individuals to exercise their data rights.

What happened

The training provider required a signed form and ID to grant access to personal data, which the person did not provide.

Who was affected

The individual who requested access to their personal data from the training provider.

What the authority found

The authority determined that the provider's method of verifying identity was not reasonable and hindered the person's right to access their data.

Why this matters

This case shows that companies must facilitate data access requests without imposing unreasonable requirements. Businesses should review their processes to ensure compliance with data protection laws.

GDPR Articles Cited
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 12(2) GDPR
Art. 12(6) GDPR
Art. 25(2) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(c) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 12(2) GDPR
Art. 12(6) GDPR
Art. 25(2) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(c) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Finnish DPA was notified that a provider of first aid training ("controller") had requested the data subject to submit by email a signed form and a copy of their ID in order to exercise the right of access. The data subject made an access request but did not provide the filled in form and a copy of their ID. Therefore, the controller did not provide access to the personal data. The DPA had asked the controller to explain how it facilitated the exercise of data subject rights. In addition, the DPA also asked the controller to clarify how long it retained personal data. In response to the request, the controller clarified that it could not confirm the identity of the data subject because the access request had been submitted by email, which only contained the name and email address of the data subject. Therefore, the controller could not fulfill the request, because the data subject had not agreed to submit the signed information request form or to identify themselves as requested by the controller. Concerning the retention periods, the controller stated that the completed training was valid for three years and that the personal data would be erased two years after the end of the validity period. On the basis of the information provided by the controller, the DPA considered that the controller's method of identifying the data subject was not based on a case-by-case assessment and that requesting a copy of the identity document was a standard means of identification. The DPA emphasised that the controller's possibility to request additional information to confirm the identity of the data subject in accordance with Article 12(6) GDPR must not lead to unreasonable requirements and the collection of personal data that is not necessary to verify the connection between the data subject and the personal data requested. The DPA found that the controller had not facilitated the exercise of data subject rights in accordance with Article 12(2) GDPR, as the data subject an

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case TSV/224/2023 in FI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

19 February 2024

Authority

DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-7682

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case TSV/224/2023 - Finland (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: