DPA case 0609-20/2024/6 – Complaint Upheld (Slovenia, 2024)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A complaint was upheld against a company for sharing borrowers' personal data with their employers without consent. This matters because it highlights the importance of keeping personal information private and secure. The company was warned and must improve its data handling practices to avoid future issues.
What happened
The company forwarded borrowers' personal data to their employers without obtaining consent.
Who was affected
Borrowers whose personal and financial data was shared with their employers were affected.
What the authority found
The authority found that the company did not have a valid legal basis for processing the personal data, violating GDPR rules.
Why this matters
This case shows that companies can be held accountable for mishandling personal data. It serves as a reminder for businesses to ensure they have proper consent before sharing any personal information.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject filed a complaint against a legal entity (the controller) for forwarding and disclosure of personal data of borrowers (‘data subjects’) to their employers. The data subject's identification, financial and economic data was processed due to a security failure of the responsible person - a director of the risk management unit (‘director’). The DPA held that the controller did not meet the conditions for the lawfulness of the processing set out in Article 6(1) GDPR. As the data subjects did no consent to the sharing of their personal data with their employers, the responsible person of the employer violated [https://pisrs.si/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO7959 Article 96(1)(1) of the Slovenian Data Protection Law ('ZVOP-2')] for breaching the fundamental principles of data processing. Additionally, the director failed to uphold security measures which led to the sharing of borrowers' data with their employers. The failure to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure the security of borrowers' personal data constitutes an infringement of the controller's obligation under Article 32 GDPR. Because the infringement occurred within the scope of the director's business activities and on behalf of the legal entity they represented, according [https://pisrs.si/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO7959 Article 96(1) ZVOP-2], the liability should be assigned to the responsible individual who committed the offense. As a result, the DPA issued a warning to both the director and its employer and ordered them to pay a court fee of €30.
Outcome
Complaint Upheld
A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for DPA case 0609-20/2024/6 in SI
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case 0609-20/2024/6 - Slovenia (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: