Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

DPA case DPA 2021-0.415.529 – Complaint Upheld (Austria, 2021)

Complaint Upheld
Datenschutzbehörde6 August 2021Austria
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian jobseeker complained about receiving unwanted job offers after asking a company to stop contacting them. This case is significant because it emphasizes the importance of respecting people's requests to erase their data.

What happened

The Austrian DPA upheld a complaint against a company for ignoring a jobseeker's request to stop sending messages.

Who was affected

The jobseeker who received unsolicited job offers from the company.

What the authority found

The DPA ruled that the company must comply with the jobseeker's right to erasure and justify its data processing.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces that companies must respect users' requests regarding their personal data. Businesses should have clear processes to handle such requests.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 14 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(2) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 17(1)(d) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(GDPR)
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 14(GDPR)
Art. 17(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject was registered as a jobseeker with the Austrian Public Employment Service. The data subject received unsolicited job offers from a company (“the controller”) by text message, whereby the company had informed the data subject by telephone that it had received the data subject’s contact details from the Austrian Public Employment Service (“AMS’). The data subject emailed the controller with a request for erasure, but received no response from the controller. The data subject continued to receive further text messages with job offers from the controller. The data subject then lodged a complaint with the Austrian DPA (“Datenschutzbehörde”). The controller argued that since the data subject had had been registered as a jobseeker with the AMS at the time of the first contact, it was not considered unlawful to send a job offer to the data subject. It therefore had a right to process the data subject’s data for the purposes of its business and thus had legitimate interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The controller did not address the issue of the data subject's right to erasure in its statement. The data subject stated that they did not question the legality of the collection of their data as they were aware that the controller collected personal data such as their telephone number from the AMS. The data subject only wanted to enforce their right to erasure. The data subject explained that they had suspended all of their job advertisements via the AMS’s online portal, because they no longer needed support from the AMS. However, the data subject still received text messages from the controller with job offers despite several requests for erasure. The DPA held that the controller is required to not only justify the lawfulness of its data processing under Article 6 GDPR, but also to comply with the principles of processing under Article 5 GDPR. Under Article 5(2) GDPR, the controller is not only obligated to comply with these principles, but must also be a

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case DPA 2021-0.415.529 in AT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

6 August 2021

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-7914

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case DPA 2021-0.415.529 - Austria (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: