Enforcing jurisdiction
Finland · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

DPA case TSV/5059/2023 – No Violation (Finland, 2026)

No Violation
DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu4 August 2026Finland
final
No Violation

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A pension insurance company shared an applicant's pension amount with a doctor for a disability evaluation. The data protection authority found this was allowed because the information was necessary for the doctor's assessment. This ruling helps clarify when sharing personal data is appropriate in similar situations.

What happened

The pension insurance company disclosed an applicant's pension accrual to a physician for a medical evaluation.

Who was affected

The applicant whose pension information was shared with the physician.

What the authority found

The data protection authority ruled that the company did not violate data protection rules by sharing the pension information.

Why this matters

This decision shows that sharing relevant personal information with medical professionals can be justified. Companies should ensure they understand when sharing such data is necessary.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 25(2) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A pension insurance company (the controller) had disclosure the amount of an applicant's (the data subject's) pension accrual in euros to a physician who conducted a medical evaluation of the data subject in March 2023. The purpose of the evaluation was to decide whether the data subject was entitled to disability pension. The DPA investigated whether the controller had violated the principle of data minimisation laid down in Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and the obligation to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures under Article 25(2) GDPR. The controller argued that the physician needed information on the data subject's accrued pension benefits to be able to assess the data subject's ability to work. The physician conducting the medical evaluation generally receives data on the applicants' health status and employment history and gives a reasoned opinion on whether the conditions for granting disability pension are fulfilled. According to the controller, the physician must know the data subject's accrued pension benefits to assess their ability to work and determine whether the data subject would fall under the employment pension or the national pension system. The DPA held that the controller had not acted in violation of Articles 5(1)(c) and 25(2) GDPR by disclosing the data subject's accrued pension to a physician involved in processing the application for disability pension. According to the DPA, no facts had come to light in the present case that would justify the opposite conclusion. The DPA pointed out that information on the data subject's accrued pension was appropriate, relevant, and necessary for the processing of the pension application. It also argued that the physician acted under professional liability and was bound by a statutory duty of confidentiality. Finally, the DPA noted that it was in the data subject's best interest for the physician to know the exact amount of the data subject's pension accrual – the physician's evaluation a

Outcome

No Violation

The DPA investigated and found no violation.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for DPA case TSV/5059/2023 in FI

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

4 August 2026

Authority

DPA Tietosuojavaltuutetu

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-10311

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. DPA case TSV/5059/2023 - Finland (2026). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: