METRO BILBAO, S.A. – Dismissed (Spain, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Spanish data protection authority dismissed a case against METRO BILBAO for using thermal cameras during the pandemic. This is important because it clarifies that certain health measures may not fall under GDPR if no personal data is collected.
What happened
An investigation found that METRO BILBAO's use of thermal cameras did not involve processing personal data.
Who was affected
Metro users who were monitored for temperature without their data being recorded.
What the authority found
The authority concluded that GDPR did not apply because no personal data was collected or processed.
Why this matters
This decision sets a precedent for how health-related monitoring can be conducted without falling under strict data protection laws, which is useful for businesses implementing safety measures.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The Spanish DPA (AEPD) launched an investigation on the company that manages the underground service of Bilbao, one of the main Spanish cities. In the context of the covid-19 pandemic, the company was using thermal cameras to verify if the users of the underground had a higher temperature than a threshold (37.3ºC), in order to identify potential infected people. People were randomly picked to pass through the range of the cameras, that would show their temperature. What was shown was only a temperature map; images were not processed in any way, nor there was any kind of facial recognition system. Data were neither registered, stored or processed in any way. The only consequence deriving from the temperature map would be that the employees in charge would carry out a second test, with a clinic thermometer, to verify whether the temperature was above the threshold. Then, if still shown to be above the threshold, they would receive a recommendation on how to act (i.e. not use the metro and contact a doctor). The Spanish DPA, in line with the allegations of the controller, concluded that the GDPR was not applicable to this case, as it did not fall under its material scope. The temperature measurement was done without identification, without recording and without registering data of the persons, as their identification is not required either by official document or verbally. At no time was any personal data stored or recorded, neither image data, nor temperature data, nor name and surname, nor any other data relating to an identified or identifiable natural person. No information was stored, which could imply the impossibility of identifying a person by collecting only indirect identifiers, such as the aforementioned heat map or temperature; and no direct identifiers, such as an image or similar, nor the results of the temperature measurements were stored nor were the results transferred to another kind of non-automated or automated support. At all times, the anonymi
Outcome
Dismissed
The complaint or investigation was dismissed.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for METRO BILBAO, S.A. in ES
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. METRO BILBAO, S.A. - Spain (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: