Dante International SA – €40,000 Fine (Romania, date unknown)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
Three Hungarian complainants raised erasure and rectification issues with Dante’s eMAG operations. Excessive signed-request requirements, mail filtering and limited communication channels hindered erasure requests; information about third-country transfers was incomplete. An old email address retained for accounting documentation was reactivated for complaint correspondence after rectification. Acting as lead authority following Article 60 cooperation with Hungary, ANSPDCP imposed RON 148,830 / EUR 30,000 under Article 12(2) and 17(1), plus RON 49,610 / EUR 10,000 under Article 6(1)(a): combined RON 198,440 / EUR 40,000. It separately warned under Article 13(1)(c), (e), (f) and 14(1)(c), (e), (f). It ordered complete multilingual information, effective anonymisation and regular staff training across the group. The complete announcement establishes no operative decision date. Its dated publication heading and URL are not substituted for an adopted date or period.
What happened
Three Hungarian complainants raised erasure and rectification issues with Dante’s eMAG operations. Excessive signed-request requirements, mail filtering and limited communication channels hindered erasure requests; information about third-country transfers was incomplete. An old email address retained for accounting documentation was reactivated for complaint correspondence after rectification.
Who was affected
The original announcement identifies Dante International SA as the sanctioned Romanian controller.
What the authority found
Acting as lead authority following Article 60 cooperation with Hungary, ANSPDCP imposed RON 148,830 / EUR 30,000 under Article 12(2) and 17(1), plus RON 49,610 / EUR 10,000 under Article 6(1)(a): combined RON 198,440 / EUR 40,000. It separately warned under Article 13(1)(c), (e), (f) and 14(1)(c), (e), (f). It ordered complete multilingual information, effective anonymisation and regular staff training across the group.
Why this matters
The source describes a final cooperation decision but gives no operative decision day or month; its 20 June 2023 publication date is not substituted. Articles 24, 32, 60 and national procedural rules explain duties, remedies and procedure rather than additional fined infringements. Accounting retention and reuse for correspondence are distinguished. The transparency warning is not a third monetary fine.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Review needed — 18 October 2026.
Processing notes: date discrepancy, articles corrected, source review conflict.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
Three Hungarian complainants raised erasure and rectification issues with Dante’s eMAG operations. Excessive signed-request requirements, mail filtering and limited communication channels hindered erasure requests; information about third-country transfers was incomplete. An old email address retained for accounting documentation was reactivated for complaint correspondence after rectification. Acting as lead authority following Article 60 cooperation with Hungary, ANSPDCP imposed RON 148,830 / EUR 30,000 under Article 12(2) and 17(1), plus RON 49,610 / EUR 10,000 under Article 6(1)(a): combined RON 198,440 / EUR 40,000. It separately warned under Article 13(1)(c), (e), (f) and 14(1)(c), (e), (f). It ordered complete multilingual information, effective anonymisation and regular staff training across the group. The source describes a final cooperation decision but gives no operative decision day or month; its 20 June 2023 publication date is not substituted. Articles 24, 32, 60 and national procedural rules explain duties, remedies and procedure rather than additional fined infringements. Accounting retention and reuse for correspondence are distinguished. The transparency warning is not a third monetary fine. The complete announcement establishes no operative decision date. Its dated publication heading and URL are not substituted for an adopted date or period. Appeal status is not established by the announcement.
Related Enforcement Actions (1)
Other enforcement actions involving Dante International SA in RO
Details
Fine Date
Date not established
Authority
Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal
Fine Amount
€40,000
198,440 RON
Enforcement Tracker ID
ETid-2135
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-6086About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Dante International SA - Romania (date unknown). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: