University of Leicester – Dismissed (United Kingdom, 2019)

Dismissed
Information Commissioner's Office1 November 2019United Kingdom
final
Dismissed

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The University of Leicester withheld information about external examiners, citing privacy concerns. The UK's Information Commissioner's Office agreed with the university, finding the information was personal data. This decision shows that privacy laws can limit what information public institutions must disclose.

What happened

The University of Leicester withheld information about external examiners, citing privacy laws.

Who was affected

Individuals who served as external examiners for the university's engineering department.

What the authority found

The Information Commissioner's Office found that the university was justified in withholding the information as it was personal data.

Why this matters

This case illustrates how privacy laws can protect personal data from being disclosed, even in response to public information requests.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR

National Law Articles

Section 3(2) DPA
40(2) FOIA
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The complainant has requested information from University of Leicester about external examiners for the department of engineering between the years 2010 to 2018. The University withheld the information, citing section 40(2) (personal information) of the FOIA. The complainant challenged the decision before the ICO. The Commissioner considers the scope of her investigation to be to establish whether the Universityis entitled to withhold the requested information under section 40(2) of the FOIA. As per the applicability of Article Articles 40(2) FOIA, it must be determined whether the withheld information constitutes personal data and, in the affirmative, whether disclosure of that data would breach any of the data protection principles under the Data Protection Act. According to the ICO the information at stake is personal data. The fact that information constitutes the personal data of identifiable living individuals does not automatically exclude it from disclosure under the FOIA. The second element of the test is to determine whether disclosure would contravene any of the data protection principles. In the present case, the most relevant principle is the one protected under Article 5(1)(a) GDPR: "Personal data shall be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject". The Commissioner considers that the most likely applicable lawful bases is the legitimate interest of the controller under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. In considering the application of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR in the context of a request for information under FOIA it is necessary to consider the three-part test: (i) legitimate interest, (ii) necessity and (iii) balancing of conflicting interests. The Commissioner accepts that the complainant has (i) a legitimate interest in seeing the requested information and that the disclosure is (ii) necessary for meeting a legitimate public interest. Such interest is to be (iii) balanced against the data subjects’ interest

Outcome

Dismissed

The complaint or investigation was dismissed.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for University of Leicester in UK

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

1 November 2019

Authority

Information Commissioner's Office

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-180

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. University of Leicester - United Kingdom (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: