Enforcing jurisdiction
United Kingdom · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.

Wales Interpretation and Translation Service – Complaint Upheld (United Kingdom, 2019)

Complaint Upheld
Information Commissioner's Office7 November 2019United Kingdom
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Information Commissioner's Office upheld a complaint against the Wales Interpretation and Translation Service for not fully disclosing meeting minutes. This matters because it highlights the importance of transparency and access to information for individuals, especially those advocating for community rights.

What happened

The Wales Interpretation and Translation Service provided redacted meeting minutes, omitting attendees' names.

Who was affected

The complainant, who is an advocate for the local deaf community, was affected by the lack of access to full meeting details.

What the authority found

The ICO found that the withheld information was personal data and that the complainant had a legitimate interest in accessing it.

Why this matters

This decision emphasizes the need for organizations to balance privacy with transparency, especially when public interest is at stake. Companies should ensure they have clear policies for handling information requests.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Section 3(2) DPA
40(2) FOIA

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The complainant requested copies of minutes of the Wales Interpretation and Translation Service´ meetings. The Cardiff Council provided him with redacted copies. In particular, the names of the attendees were omitted. In substantiating its response, the Cardiff Council cited section 40(2) and section 43(2) of the FOIA. The complainant filled a complaint with the ICO because he wanted to have access to such information. The first step for the Commissioner is to determine whether the exception set forth in Articles 40(2) and 43(2) FOIA apply to the case. As per the applicability of Article Articles 40(2) FOIA, it must be determined whether the withheld information constitutes personal data and, in the affirmative, whether disclosure of that data would breach any of the data protection principles under the Data Protection Act. According to the ICO the information at stake is personal data. The fact that information constitutes the personal data of identifiable living individuals does not automatically exclude it from disclosure under the FOIA. The second element of the test is to determine whether disclosure would contravene any of the data protection principles. In the present case, the most relevant principle is the one protected under Article 5(1)(a) GDPR: "Personal data shall be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject". The Commissioner considers that the most likely applicable lawful bases is the legitimate interest of the controller under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. In considering the application of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR in the context of a request for information under FOIA it is necessary to consider the three-part test: (i) legitimate interest, (ii) necessity and (iii) balancing of conflicting interests. The Commissioner accepts that the complainant has (i) a legitimate interest in seeing the requested information and that, as an advocate for the local deaf community, the disclosure is (ii) necessary for me

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Wales Interpretation and Translation Service in UK

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

7 November 2019

Authority

Information Commissioner's Office

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Wales Interpretation and Translation Service - United Kingdom (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: