- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Belgium · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Federal Governmental Agency: Financial – Dismissed (Belgium, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Belgian Data Protection Authority dismissed a complaint from an accountant who felt wronged by the Tax Inspectorate's comments about them being a 'straw man' in a tax evasion case. The authority decided that these comments did not qualify as personal data under GDPR. This case highlights the complexities of what constitutes personal data and the limits of individuals' rights to challenge opinions expressed by government agencies.
What happened
The Belgian Data Protection Authority dismissed a complaint regarding the Tax Inspectorate's use of the term 'straw man' in relation to an accountant.
Who was affected
The accountant from Luxembourg who was referred to as a 'straw man' in tax investigations.
What the authority found
The authority ruled that the term 'straw man' did not constitute personal data, meaning the accountant could not request changes to this information.
Why this matters
This decision illustrates the challenges individuals face when trying to contest government opinions about them. It serves as a reminder for companies to understand the boundaries of personal data under GDPR.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 22 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The complainant is an accountant in Luxembourg. On 18 July 2019 and 9 August 2019, the complainant issued a request for information, access, rectification, and restriction of the processing of their personal data to the Belgian Special Tax Inspectorate ("Directie Algemene Administratie van de Bijzondere Belastinginspectie"), following the mention of their name in various files concerning investigations into tax payers. According to the complainant, the Tax Inspectorate had wrongly referred to them as a 'straw man' ("stroman") for a company alleged to have committed tax evasion. When the Tax Inspectorate rejected the complainant's requests in a letter dated 28 October 2019, the complainant filed a complaint with the Belgian DPA. Among other things, in its submissions, the Tax Inspectorate argued that the words 'straw man' and 'suspected straw man' do not constitute personal data as defined by the GDPR, since they concern an opinion or viewpoint of the Tax Inspectorate regarding the relation of the complainant to the relevant company. The complainant is therefore not entitled to request rectification of this data, or restriction of its processing. Further, the Tax Inspectorate argued that, in accordance with Article 322 §1 of the Income Tax Law 1992 ('wetboek van de inkombelastingen', or 'WIB92') it is entitled to take a position on relevant tax issues to ensure the correct collection of tax. Specifically, this means that it is entitled to state that the complainant is suspected of acting as a 'straw man'. It argued a different reading of Article 322 §1 WIB92 would be contrary to Article 322 §1 WIB92 itself, as well as to a civil servant's freedom of expression within the meaning of Article 10 ECHR. The Tax Inspectorate also argued that it had indeed satisfied the complainant's right to information under Article 14. This is because Law of 3 August 2012 containing provisions on the processing of personal data by the Tax Inspectorate in connection with its tasks, speci
Outcome
Dismissed
The complaint or investigation was dismissed.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for Federal Governmental Agency: Financial in BE
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Decision Date
4 June 2021
Authority
Autorité de Protection des Données
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Federal Governmental Agency: Financial - Belgium (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: