Enforcing jurisdiction
Denmark · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

The Danish Customs and Tax Administration – Violation Found (Denmark, 2021)

Violation Found
Datatilsynet (Denmark)22 September 2021Denmark
final
Violation Found

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Denmark's Data Protection Authority criticized The Danish Customs and Tax Administration for mishandling a personal data breach. This case is important because it shows that organizations must handle data breaches responsibly.

What happened

The Danish Customs and Tax Administration sent personal data to the wrong recipient and failed to notify the affected person promptly.

Who was affected

The individual whose personal data was mistakenly sent to another person.

What the authority found

The authority found that the Customs and Tax Administration did not comply with GDPR requirements regarding data breach notifications.

Why this matters

This case underscores the need for organizations to have clear procedures for managing data breaches and notifying affected individuals in a timely manner.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 34(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 34(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 22 March 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 12 July 2021, the Danish Customs and Tax Administration (CTA) reported a personal data breach to the Danish DPA (Datatilsynet). The CTA had sent a letter containing the personal data (of someone else) in the form of identification data, financial information and social security number, to the wrong recipient. The CTA knew already on 8 July that a breach had possibly occured, because the incorrect recipient made them aware. After the CTA's internal investigation, they concluded on 9 July that a personal data breach had indeed happened. From the report to the DPA, the CTA stated that the affected data subject was informed on 10 July. Because of the information they had provided, the DPA closed the matter on 23 July. However, on 20 August the DPA received a follow-up from the CTA, stating that they had not, in fact, informed the affected data subject on 10 July, as the initially reported, but on 18 August. The CTA explained that their late follow-up was due to the vacation period. Because of the new information, the DPA decided to reopen the case. The DPA held that the Customs and Tax Administration had not processed personal data in line with Article 34(1) GDPR. They expressed serious criticism of the way the CTA had dealt with the personal data breach, in particular i) that the CTA first, incorrectly, reported to the DPA that they had notified the affected data subject shortly after, and ii) that they blamed their late response on "extraordinary circumstances" due to vacation period, which the DPA does not agree is a valid excuse.

Outcome

Violation Found

The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for The Danish Customs and Tax Administration in DK

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

22 September 2021

Authority

Datatilsynet (Denmark)

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-4111

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. The Danish Customs and Tax Administration - Denmark (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: