Komplett Bank ASA – Complaint Upheld (Norway, 2021)
Norway's data protection authority found that Komplett Bank ASA sent marketing emails without a proper legal basis. The bank claimed it was necessary for a contract, but the court disagreed. The bank also took too long to respond to information requests.
What happened
Komplett Bank ASA sent direct marketing emails without a valid legal basis and delayed responses to information requests.
Who was affected
Customers who received unwanted marketing emails from Komplett Bank ASA.
What the authority found
The Norwegian DPA ruled that the bank unlawfully processed personal data for marketing and provided misleading information about its legal basis.
Why this matters
This case underscores the importance of having a clear legal basis for processing personal data and responding promptly to customer inquiries. Businesses should ensure transparency in their privacy policies and respect customer objections to marketing.
GDPR Articles Cited
A data subject received direct marketing in e-mail from the controller Komplett Bank ASA despite of having previously objected to such processing pursuant to Article 21(3) GDPR. The controller's privacy statement and on-line customer portal suggested the lawful basis used for the direct marketing was «Consent» pursuant to Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. The data subject had at no point given consent for processing of his personal information for direct marketing purposes. Communication between the data subject and the controller's data privacy officer eventually revealed that the controller was using another lawful basis for this processing, specifically «Necessary for the performance of a contract» pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) GDPR. The contract in question regarded a credit card service bundled with a non-optional customer benefit / loyalty program. While the customer benefit program part of the contract did contain a clause stating the controller would send direct marketing to its customers, the data subject considered that such marketing activity could not be considered objectively necessary for the performance of the contract. The responses from the controller's data privacy officer to the data subject's requests for information did on multiple occasions exceed the maximum time limit of 30 days pursuant to Article 12(3) GDPR. The DPA held that Komplett Bank ASA had: * violated Article 6(1) GDPR by processing personal data for direct marketing purposes without a lawful basis. The DPA held that main subject-matter of the contract was the issuance of a credit card, not direct marketing, and that the controller's use of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR «Necessary for the performance of a contract» was unlawful. * violated Articles 12(1) and 13(1) GDPR by providing misleading information about the lawful basis used for processing of personal data for direct marketing purposes. * violated Article 12(3) GDPR by exceeding the time limit for responding to the data subjects requests for info
Outcome
Complaint Upheld
A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.
Violations (1)
The cookie banner uses misleading language to trick or pressure users into accepting cookies (dark patterns).
Art. 7 GDPR
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for Komplett Bank ASA in NO
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Similar Cases
Enforcement actions with similar violations
Website operator
2023 · Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
Pagamastarde S.L.
2021 · Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
Marbella Resorts S.L.
2021 · Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
BANKIA, S.A.
2021 · Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
GOOGLE LLC
2025 · Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Komplett Bank ASA - Norway (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: