Enforcing jurisdiction
Sweden · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Google LLC – Complaint Upheld (Sweden, 2022)

Complaint Upheld
Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten26 July 2022Sweden
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Swedish DPA reprimanded Google for initially denying requests to remove search results. The authority found that Google incorrectly placed the burden on users to prove their requests were valid. This ruling is important because it reinforces users' rights to have their data managed fairly.

What happened

Google denied requests from users to remove certain search results based on accessibility issues.

Who was affected

Users who requested the removal of specific search results from Google.

What the authority found

The DPA ruled that Google violated GDPR by not properly handling users' requests to remove their data.

Why this matters

This decision highlights the responsibility of companies like Google to respect user rights. It encourages all businesses to ensure they have clear processes for managing data removal requests.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 12(2) GDPR
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 12(2) GDPR
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 21(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Swedish DPA assessed five complaints from data subjects who had requested removal of search results in accordance with Article 17(1) and 21 GDPR. All five requests had been denied on the ground that the contents of the web pages in question were inaccessible to Google due to paywalls, and that Google was therefore unable to assess whether the contents were no longer relevant or inaccurate. After the complaints were filed, Google acted on the requests. Nevertheless, the Swedish DPA assessed Google's explanation for refusing the requests in the first place. The DPA held that the data subject had exercised their right to object to the processing in accordance with the GDPR. Pursuant to Article 17(1)(c) GDPR, the burden of proof for the existence of overriding legitimate grounds for the continued processing is on the controller and not the data subject. The DPA highlighted that by denying the requests due to Google's alleged inability to access the contents of the relevant web pages, Google was placing the burden of proof on the data subjects. By this logic, the data subjects would have had to gather additional information from the relevant web pages themselves in order for Google to act on the requests. As a result, the data subjects would in practice be forced to pay to be able to exercise their rights. Against this background, the Swedish DPA reprimanded Google for violating Articles 12, 17 and 21 GDPR.

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Details

Decision Date

26 July 2022

Authority

Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5185

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google LLC - Sweden (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: