Google LLC – Dismissed (Spain, 2022)

Dismissed
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos16 August 2022Spain
final
Dismissed

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Google was not required to remove certain search results after a person requested their erasure. The Spanish DPA found that the information was of public interest and legally published. This case shows that the right to be forgotten has limits when balanced against public interest.

What happened

Google refused to de-index search results for URLs containing personal data, citing public interest.

Who was affected

A person who requested the removal of search results linking to their personal data.

What the authority found

The Spanish DPA held that Google could deny the de-indexing requests because the information was of public interest and legally required to be accessible.

Why this matters

This decision highlights that the right to be forgotten is not absolute and must be balanced with public interest and transparency. Website operators should consider these factors when handling similar requests.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 17 GDPR
Art. 17(3)(b) GDPR
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject exercised their right to erasure by requesting Google LLC (controller) to de-index search results of four URLs that contained their personal data. The controller rejected this request twice. The data subject then filed a complaint with the Spanish DPA. During the investigation, the controller reconsidered and removed two of the four URLs. The two remaining URLs concerned an employee selection process at the State General Administrative Body. A provisional list of candidates and assessments relating to the selection process were published on the body's website. The controller stated that the two remaining URLs referred to information that was of public interest. It argued that institutional websites play an important role in keeping citizens informed on matters of interest to them. The information there should therefore be accessible without restrictions. The controller further argued that the CJEU had held that search results should only be de-indexed after a balancing test of the rights at stake, namely the right to be forgotten and freedom of information. The right to be forgotten cannot imply a retrospective censorship of information correctly published at the time. The DPA noted that under Article 17(3)(b) GDPR, personal data shall not be erased if their processing is necessary to comply with a legal obligation imposed by Union or Member State law. Pursuant to Spanish Law 39/2015 on administrative procedures, administrative acts shall be published (1) if this is laid down in the rules of procedure or (2) when the competent body deems it appropriate for reasons of public interest.Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Administrations. The DPA held that the accessibility of publications on the website of a public institution guarantees legal certainty and administrative transparency. Therefore, it may be in the public interest to not de-index the URLs. Thus, Google LLC could reject the de-indexing requests on t

Outcome

Dismissed

The complaint or investigation was dismissed.

Details

Decision Date

16 August 2022

Authority

Agencia Española de Protección de Datos

GDPRhub ID

gdprhub-5217

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google LLC - Spain (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: