Enforcing jurisdiction
Belgium · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Zorg & Gezondheid – Complaint Upheld (Belgium, 2022)

Complaint Upheld
Autorité de Protection des Données18 November 2022Belgium
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Zorg & Gezondheid faced a complaint after a person asked about how their data was being processed but received no answers. The Belgian Data Protection Authority found the complaint valid, stating that everyone has the right to inquire about their personal data. This case highlights the importance of transparency in data handling.

What happened

A person complained that Zorg & Gezondheid did not respond to their questions about data processing.

Who was affected

The individual who was contacted by a Covid-19 contact tracer and sought information about their personal data.

What the authority found

The Belgian Data Protection Authority ruled that the complaint was admissible, affirming the right to inquire about personal data processing.

Why this matters

This case emphasizes that organizations must be transparent and responsive to inquiries about personal data. It serves as a reminder for companies to ensure they have clear communication channels regarding data processing.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 15 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 13(1) GDPR
Art. 13(2) GDPR
Art. 14(1) GDPR
Art. 14(2) GDPR
Art. 57(4) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 13(1) GDPR
Art. 13(2) GDPR
Art. 14(1) GDPR
Art. 14(2) GDPR
Art. 15(GDPR)
Art. 57(4) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 3 February 2022, the data subject was called by Covid-19 contact tracer (controller) after a confirmed Covid-19 infection within the family of the data subject. The data subject asked questions to an employee of the controller on the phone regarding data processing done by the controller. However, this employee was not able to answer the questions regarding this processing. On 4 February 2022, the data subject also filed an access request, to which the controller did not respond either. The data subject filed a complaint at the Belgian DPA on 21 March 2022 regarding two potential violations: a lack of transparency and the failure to address the data subject’s request. The investigation service of the DPA (investigation service) started an investigation into the controller and determined that the data subject did not have a sufficient interest. In her complaint, the data subject did not link the processing operation of the controller to herself. She was not able to prove that the controller was processing personal data at all and if so, what kind of personal data the controller was processing. Therefore, the data subject was acting in public interest, which made the complaint inadmissible according to the investigation service. The data subject disagreed and stated that the controller had asked for several categories of personal data (including medical information) regarding the data subject and her family in a phone call. According to the data subject, it seemed that this personal data was also saved by the controller, since the mother and husband of the data subject were called shortly after the data subject provided their contact details. The DPA disagreed with its investigation service, and stated that the complaint was admissible. The DPA stated that Article 58 WOG (Act establishing the DPA) allowed every data subject with a ‘sufficient interest’ to submit a complaint. The DPA confirmed that the controller processed the data subject’s personal data and s

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for Zorg & Gezondheid in BE

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

18 November 2022

Authority

Autorité de Protection des Données

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Zorg & Gezondheid - Belgium (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: