M&M Inkasso OÜ – Violation Found (Estonia, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Estonian debt collection company was found to have violated privacy rules by posting debtors' personal information on social media. This matters because it shows that companies cannot use personal data as a form of retaliation. The decision emphasizes the need for a valid legal basis when sharing personal data publicly.
What happened
M&M Inkasso OÜ published debtors' personal information on social media without a valid legal basis.
Who was affected
Individuals whose debt information was shared publicly by the debt collection company.
What the authority found
The Estonian DPA determined that the company had no valid legal basis for publishing debtors' information, as it did not protect any vital interests, violating Article 6(1)(d) GDPR.
Why this matters
This decision highlights that companies must have a legitimate reason for sharing personal data and cannot use it for retaliatory purposes. It serves as a warning to businesses about the importance of respecting individuals' privacy rights.
GDPR Articles Cited
National Law Articles
M&M Inkasso OÜ (the controller) was a debt collection company, which published information about debtors (data subjects), including names and photographs, on its website and social media (Facebook, Instagram and TikTok) as a form of retaliation. After receiving a tip from the public about the social media activities of the controller, the Estonian DPA started an ex officio investigation. During the proceedings, the controller explained that the publication was justified by "vital interests". Specifically, the posted content was supposed to prevent malicious exploitation of those who could get in contact with debtors. The controller also submitted that it had taken into consideration all other necessary legal considerations with a view to avoiding legal infringements and all information published on the company's website and social media was taken from the Internet and freely available. In its decision, the DPA assessed whether the controller had a valid legal basis to publish debt default data of the data subjects on social media. Firstly, the DPA referred to Recital 46 GDPR and Article 6(1)(d) GDPR, under which processing of personal data is lawful when it is necessary to protect the "vital interests of the data subject or of another natural person". However, the DPA noted that for the protection of vital interests of another natural person (who is not the data subject), this legal basis should only be used when no other, more suitable, legal basis exists. The DPA held that in the case of payment defaults, the creditor must first and foremost use the legal remedies listed in §101 of the Estonian Law of Obligations Act to obtain payment of the debt. According to the DPA, it was illegal to disclose individuals' payment default data solely as a means of retaliation. Therefore, the social media publications by the controller could not be considered as protecting the vital interest of creditors or other natural persons. Second, the DPA assessed whether the contro
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for M&M Inkasso OÜ in EE
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. M&M Inkasso OÜ - Estonia (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: