- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Grindr LLC – Order (Austria, 2025)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
Grindr LLC was ordered to improve its process for handling user data access requests. The company had previously required users to provide extra personal information, which was deemed unnecessary. This order aims to ensure that users can access their data more easily.
What happened
Grindr LLC was required to extend the validity of verification codes for user data access requests.
Who was affected
Users of the Grindr app who requested access to their personal data were affected.
What the authority found
The Austrian Data Protection Authority found that Grindr's previous verification process was unreasonable and ordered improvements.
Why this matters
This order emphasizes the importance of making it easy for users to access their data. Companies should ensure their processes align with GDPR requirements to avoid complications.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
Grindr LLC (the controller) is an online dating app for gay, bi, trans and queer people. A data subject filed a complaint to the DPA on 11 November 2021 regarding a violation of their right to access. The data subject was represented by noyb. At the time, the controller required the data subject to provide further personal data when responding to access requests (such as a high-resolution photo of an official photo ID). According to the data subject, this was a violation of the principle of data minimisation (Article 5(1)(c) GDPR). In addition, the controller could not request this information unless it had reasonable doubts about the data subject’s identity, in accordance with Article 12(6) GDPR. The data subject received a copy of their data in August 2022. The controller argued that at the time it was unable to verify the data subject’s identity if they submitted an access request through a web browser or the controller’s website. This meant the controller had reasonable doubts regarding the identity of the data subject. In the meantime, the controller implemented a function that allowed it to verify users by sending a link to the data subject’s email address. The data subject contested this measure, arguing that it was virtually impossible to comply with it due to the fact that the verification code was valid for only 30 minutes. The data subject was also not informed of when to expect to receive the verification code. The DPA did not find a violation of the data subject’s right of access. During the proceedings, the data subject received a copy of their data. Therefore, the DPA considered that the violation had been remedied. This was based on national case law denying the right to find a violation in case a past infringement has since been remedied.Constitutional Court June 26, 1991, VfSgl. No. 12.768 Nonetheless, the DPA stated that the period of validity for the verification code was not compliant with the GDPR. The controller could take up to 30 days to process the data subject’s access request, however, the confirmation link and code were valid for only 30 minutes. Combined with the time difference (the controller was located in the US), this would require EU data subjects to be ready at any moment to use the confirmation link in order to access their data. The DPA stated that this was unreasonable, and a violation of the controller’s obligation to facilitate the data subject in exercising their rights under the GDPR (Article 12(2) GDPR). The DPA ordered the controller to extend the validity of the confirmation link and code to 24 hours.
Outcome
Order
A binding order requiring the controller to take specific action.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for Grindr LLC in AT
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Grindr LLC - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: