Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

KSV Information GmbH – Complaint Upheld (Austria, 2025)

Complaint Upheld
Datenschutzbehörde25 September 2025Austria
final
Complaint Upheld

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

KSV Information GmbH faced a complaint upheld by Austria's data protection authority for mishandling a user's automated decision-making process. The company failed to provide adequate information about how a credit score affected a user's application. This ruling stresses the need for transparency in automated processes.

What happened

KSV Information GmbH did not provide sufficient information about an automated decision that affected a user's application for energy services.

Who was affected

A user whose application for energy services was rejected based on an automated credit score decision.

What the authority found

The authority ruled that KSV Information GmbH violated GDPR by not adequately informing the user about the automated decision-making process.

Why this matters

This case underscores the importance of transparency in automated decision-making. Companies using such processes must ensure users are fully informed about how their data is used.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 12 GDPR
Art. 13(2) GDPR
Art. 14(2)(g) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(g) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(h) GDPR
Art. 22(1) GDPR
Art. 22(2) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 12(GDPR)
Art. 13(2) GDPR
Art. 14(2)(g) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(g) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(h) GDPR
Art. 22(1) GDPR
Art. 22(2) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(f) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Entities Involved

KSV Information GmbH
go green Energy GmbH und Co KG

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject, via a service company, attempted to conclude an energy supply contract with a distribution company for electrical energy and gas (“energy provider”). After filling out the relevant form, the data subject first received a welcome email confirming him as a new customer within one minute, and immediately thereafter a message informing him that his application had been rejected for creditworthiness reasons. The rejection of the data subject's application was based on a credit score the energy provider requested from a credit information agency ("the credit information agency"). The entire process took place without the involvement of a natural person, and neither at the time of the alleged infringement nor at the time of the complaint did the privacy policies of either the energy provider or the credit information agency provide any information about the existence of such an automated decision. The data subject subsequently submitted access requests to both controllers under Article 15 GDPR. However, both controllers provided incomplete information concerning the automated decision, including the logic involved, or the procedures and principles applied in the automated processing of the data subject’s personal data. Following the data subject’s intervention, the energy provider offered to conclude an energy supply contract with the data subject on different terms, but, in the meantime, the data subject had felt compelled to enter into a less economically favorable contract with a competitor. The data subject claimed violations of Article 13(2)(f) GDPR , Article 14(2)(g) GDPR, Article 15(1)(a) GDPRand Article 22(1) GDPR. The data subject also requested that the Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) order both controllers to provide a complete response under Article 15(1)(h) GDPR and to prohibit automated decision-making. Holding concerning the credit information agency: The DPA held that the credit information agency violated the data subject's rig

Outcome

Complaint Upheld

A data subject complaint that was upheld by the DPA.

Related Enforcement Actions (0)

No other enforcement actions found for KSV Information GmbH in AT

This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Decision Date

25 September 2025

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. KSV Information GmbH - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: