- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
Court case W211 2223654-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2019)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court in Austria ruled on a case where a citizen wanted to access their personal data. The court decided that the citizen did not need legal aid to pursue their complaint, which is significant for understanding access rights.
What happened
The court ruled that the citizen's request for legal aid was unnecessary.
Who was affected
The individual involved was a citizen seeking access to their personal data from a company.
What the authority found
The court found that the citizen could represent themselves in the case without needing a lawyer.
Why this matters
This ruling clarifies that individuals can pursue their rights without legal representation in straightforward cases. It encourages users to assert their rights regarding personal data access.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Review needed — 20 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected, date discrepancy.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
A citizen requested a copy of his personal data from a controller under Article 15 GDPR. The controller requested a copy of an identity document for identification purposes. Following the request of an official identity document, the data subject (the complainant) submitted a complaint before the Austrian DPA for violation of his right to access. The DPA dismissed the complaint as unfounded. The applicant lodged an appeal before the Federal Court and requested legal aid. The Court had to assess whether it was necessary to grant the complainant legal aid. The Court found it was not necessary to grant legal aid for to have the complainant represented by a lawyer, as the complainant was obviously able to file a complaint with the DPA himself, the Judged at the BVwG have to assist the complainant in filing the case and during the hearing ("Manuduktionspflicht") and the factual and legal issues are rather trivial. The application for legal aid was denied. No decision on the material issues was made.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case W211 2223654-1 in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W211 2223654-1 - Austria (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: