Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 4 K 252/19.GI – Court Ruling (Germany, 2019)

Court Ruling
DPA VGGieen23 October 2019Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that an insolvency administrator could not access a company's tax records. This is significant because it clarifies that only the company itself has the right to access its own data.

What happened

The court found that an insolvency administrator cannot exercise the right to access on behalf of a company.

Who was affected

The insolvency administrator representing B. GmbH.

What the authority found

The court decided that the insolvency administrator is a 'third party' and cannot claim access to the company's tax records.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the personal nature of data access rights. Companies should ensure they understand who can access their data, especially in legal situations.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 4(10) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(10) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§80 Data Protection Law of Hessen (Hessisches Datenschutz- und Informationsfreiheitsgesetz)
§2a(5) German Tax Law (Abgabenordnung)
Decision AuthorityVG Gießen

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff was designated as insolvency administrator for the B. GmbH (a limited liability company), that was not able to communicate its financial records after the opening of the insolvency procedure. Needing those records for the procedure, the plaintiff requested that the tax office of Gießen provide him with the documents. He based his demand, amongst other grounds, on §80 of the Hessian data protection law (freedom of information) and the the right of access (Article 15 GDPR) of the debtor on its behalf. This was possible as the applicable German law expands the right to access to legal entities in this specific case. The tax office refused, arguing that the plaintiff could not be considered as the data subject concerned but only as a “third party” as defined in Article 4(10) GDPR. Can an insolvency administrator exercise the right to access on behalf of a company? The Administrative Court of Gießen ruled in favor of the tax office. The Court started by demonstrating that the debtor, a corporation, had indeed a right of access under Article 15 GDPR in all taxation matters despite not being a natural person, in accordance with §2a(5) of the Abgabenordnung (national tax law). The Court then agreed with the tax office that the plaintiff is a “third party” and pointed out that the right of access is a highly personal right which could neither be alienated nor transferred, not even in the event of the opening of an insolvency procedure. Thus, the insolvency administrator had no rightful claim against the tax office for the release of financial records of the debtor.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 4 K 252/19.GI in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

23 October 2019

Authority

DPA VGGieen

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 4 K 252/19.GI - Germany (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: