Google Inc. – Court Ruling (France, 2020)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
In France, Google's appeal against a fine for not removing search results globally was upheld. The court decided Google only needs to remove results within Europe, not worldwide. This case is important because it clarifies how far-reaching data protection rules are when it comes to search engines.
What happened
Google was challenged for not removing search results globally after a de-referencing request.
Who was affected
Individuals in Europe who requested the removal of their personal data from Google's search results.
What the authority found
The court ruled that Google must only remove search results within European versions of its search engine, not globally.
Why this matters
This decision clarifies that search engines are only required to comply with de-referencing requests within the EU, setting a precedent for how global companies handle data protection requests. It highlights the balance between privacy rights and the global nature of the internet.
GDPR Articles Cited
In 2016, the CNIL fined Google Inc. 100,000 € for failing to comply with de-referencing request on all national versions of its search engine Google Search. Google challenged the decision before the Council of State. The CNIL claimed that the deletion of personal data has to be performed worldwide to provide effective protection of the rights of individuals. Google Inc. claimed that their measures adopted in March 2016 were sufficient. They implemented a mechanism which automatically redirects to the national version used by the data subject and which blocks the access, to delete the content for any Internet user identified as being located in the same territory. First, the Council of State recalled that the alleged breach of Google Inc. must be judged in accordance with the applicable law, back in 2016. Then, in the lights of the preliminary ruling, [http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=16464B0169F79B4108F764FA1F804123?text=&docid=218105&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3004072 C-507/17], the Council of Stated issued that Google Inc. took sufficient and appropriate measures, and that the de-referencing obligation has to be implemented at the European level. C-507/17 ruling : "where a search engine operator grants a request for de-referencing pursuant to those provisions, that operator is not required to carry out that de-referencing on all versions of its search engine, but on the versions of that search engine corresponding to all the Member States, using, where necessary, measures which, while meeting the legal requirements, effectively prevent or, at the very least, seriously discourage an internet user conducting a search from one of the Member States on the basis of a data subject’s name from gaining access, via the list of results displayed following that search, to the links which are the subject of that request", Finally, the Court pointed out that the French government did not adopted any special p
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Google Inc. in FR
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
27 March 2020
Authority
Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-court-2262About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google Inc. - France (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: