- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Veterinarian (anonymous) – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A veterinarian in Germany was warned by the data protection authority for sharing pet owners' data with a clearing house without their consent. This matters because it highlights the importance of getting permission before sharing personal information. The authority wants the veterinarian to confirm that they will ask for consent in the future.
What happened
The veterinarian shared pet owners' data with a clearing house for billing purposes without their explicit consent.
Who was affected
Pet owners whose data was shared without their consent.
What the authority found
The authority found that the data transmission did not meet GDPR requirements for consent.
Why this matters
This case emphasizes that companies must obtain consent before sharing personal data. It serves as a reminder for all businesses to review their data-sharing practices.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The plaintiff is a veterinarian and has concluded a billing contract and a contract processing agreement (under Article 28 GDPR) with the clearing house for veterinarians (VTX). In case of default of payment, the VTX becomes owner of the claim (assignment of claim) in order to enforce it. The pet owner's data are transmitted to VTX for accounting purposes and the possible enforcement of claims before VTX declares its acceptance of an assignment of claims. This is done without the (explicit) consent of the pet owner. After a pet owner failed to pay a ~EUR 1.000 treatment invoice of the plaintiff, the claim was assigned to the VTX without the pet owner's consent. The pet owner filed a complaint with the competent supervisory authority (Landesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit Rheinland-Pfalz – LfDI) which issued a warning under Article 58(2)(b) GDPR, holding that the data transmission from the plaintiff to the VTX did not meet the requirements under the GDPR. Moreover, the LfDI asked the plaintiff to confirm that in the future, he would transfer data of pet owners to VTX only with their prior consent. The plaintiff filed an action against that decision, stating in essence that the transmission of accounting data to the VTX was based on Article 6(1)(b) and (f) and Article 6(4) GDPR. Since the assignment was only completed upon acceptance by VTX, data transfers which - as here - took place before the declaration of acceptance were to be regarded as data processing on behalf of the plaintiff. Further, the plaintiff argued that the data transferred constituted health data under Article 9(1) and Article 4(15) GDPR but the transfer was nevertheless admissible pursuant to Article 9 GDPR, as the strict requirements of Art 7 DSGVO could not generally be observed in treatment contracts with doctors and were therefore systematically inappropriate. Three disputes werde adressed from a data protection perspective: #Does the transmission of a pet owner'
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Veterinarian (anonymous) in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
20 February 2020
Authority
DPA LFDI
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Veterinarian (anonymous) - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: