- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case AWB - 18 _ 3073 – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2018)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court in the Netherlands ruled that an employer shared sensitive personal data without a legal reason and had to pay damages. This is significant because it shows that even employers must protect their employees' personal information.
What happened
The employer shared sensitive personal data with third parties without a valid legal basis.
Who was affected
An employee whose sensitive data was shared improperly by their employer.
What the authority found
The court ordered the employer to pay €300 in damages for violating data protection laws.
Why this matters
This ruling sets a precedent that employers must be careful with how they handle employee data and could face consequences for violations.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The employer communicated sensitive data (pro justicia reports) to third parties without a legal basis and asked for damages. These were refused by the employer in the first place. The court order the employer (the Minister of Justice) to pay 300 # of damages for violation of the data protection legislation, considering that the privacy-sensitive personal data have ended up with a small group of professionals, i.e. employees and members of the Disciplinary Board, and that they have a duty of confidentiality by virtue of their position. This does not detract from the fact that the plaintiff's privacy has been violated and that this has understandably been perceived by the plaintiff as unpleasant and disadvantageous. All things considered, the court deems compensation of €300 to be fair.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case AWB - 18 _ 3073 in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
19 December 2018
Authority
DPA RbGelderland
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case AWB - 18 _ 3073 - Netherlands (2018). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: