- Enforcing jurisdiction
- France · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case N° 430810 – Court Ruling (France, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
France's Conseil d'Etat upheld a decision against Google for not being transparent about its privacy policy. This matters because it shows that companies must clearly inform users about how their data is used. Google was found to have obtained consent in a way that wasn't clear or specific enough.
What happened
Google's privacy policy was deemed insufficiently transparent and its user consent invalid.
Who was affected
Users whose data was processed by Google without clear information about how it would be used.
What the authority found
The court confirmed that Google did not have a valid legal basis for processing personal data, violating GDPR's transparency requirements.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that companies must provide clear and accessible privacy information. It sets a precedent that could impact how tech companies handle user consent in the future.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Review needed — 21 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, amount discrepancy, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
CNIL issued a fine of € 50 million against Google in CNIL - SAN-2019-001 after two complaints filed by noyb and La Quadrature du Net on the basis of lack of transparency of the privacy policy and the lack of valid legal basis to process the data. Google appealed the decision of the CNIL on several grounds, including the lack of competence of the CNIL since Google would have its main establishment in Ireland. The Conseil d'Etat confirmed the decision of the CNIL in all points and considered that the CNIL was competent to deal with the case since Google did not have a main establishment in the EU at the time of the decision of the CNIL. The Conseil d'Etat also confirmed that Google's privacy policy was not sufficiently transparent since the information was disseminated throughout several documents and was not easily accessible. The Conseil d'Etat also confirmed that the consent obtained by Google was not valid since it was not sufficiently informed and specific (the users had to accept all processing operations without the possibility to refuse specific processing operations in the first layer of information). Finally, the Conseil d'Etat confirmed that the fine was not disproportionate considering inter alia the seriousness of the violation, the financial capacity of Google, the impact of people and the duration of the violation.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case N° 430810 in FR
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
19 June 2020
Authority
Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case N° 430810 - France (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: