Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 9 Ca 6557/18 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA ArbGDsseldorf5 March 2020Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Germany ruled on a dispute about a person's right to access their personal data. This matters because it clarifies how companies should handle requests for information about personal data they hold.

What happened

The court addressed issues related to a person's request for information about their personal data and the associated costs.

Who was affected

A person seeking information about their personal data from a company.

What the authority found

The court held that the company could refuse the request if fulfilling it would be disproportionately burdensome.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how companies can manage requests for personal data, highlighting the balance between user rights and operational feasibility.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 15(2) GDPR
Art. 15(3) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 15(2) GDPR
Art. 15(3) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 1(1) GG
Article 2(1) GG
§ 130(1) BGB
§ 253(2)2 ZPO
§ 26 BDSG
Decision AuthorityArbG Düsseldorf

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

No issues were reported by that automated check.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The parties argue about data protection information and information, the issuing of copies and compensation. # on the conditions and fulfilment of the right to information under Article 15 (1), (2) of the DS-GVO in the employment relationship # the right to be granted a data copy under Art. 15 (3) DS-GVO can be objected to on the basis of the principle of good faith that the effort and expense of the person responsible is grossly disproportionate to the claimant's interest in performance. # the conditions and assessment of a claim for compensation for non-material damage under Art. 82(1) DS-GVO, here in the case of a breach of the right to information under Art. 15(1) DS-GVO # Order the defendant to provide the applicant with information on the following questions: :# the purposes for which the personal data of the plaintiff have been processed since 07.06.2018 and :# the categories of personal data processed # order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 5 000 plus interest at 5 percentage points above the base rate since 9 October 2019 # for the rest, the action is dismissed. # the plaintiff is ordered to pay the costs of the lawsuit. # the amount in dispute in the decision: € 152,982.81 # the appeal is allowed for both parties.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 9 Ca 6557/18 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

5 March 2020

Authority

DPA ArbGDsseldorf

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 9 Ca 6557/18 - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: