Court case 19A1286 โ€“ Court Ruling (Belgium, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA JugedePaixdeForest9 June 2020Belgium
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Belgian court ruled that a public transport company wrongly fined a user for not validating a ticket, even though the user had a valid ticket. The court found the company didn't clearly define why it was collecting journey data, which didn't comply with GDPR rules.

What happened

A court found that a public transport company improperly processed user journey data without clear purposes, leading to an unjust fine.

Who was affected

The affected individuals were public transport users whose journey data was processed without clear purposes.

What the authority found

The judge decided that the transport company's data processing practices did not comply with GDPR because the purposes were not clearly defined, and the fine should not be paid.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the need for companies to clearly define and communicate the purposes of data collection. It serves as a reminder that vague data practices can lead to legal challenges and overturned fines.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 5 GDPR
Art. 6 GDPR
Decision AuthorityJuge de Paix de Forest
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A STIB user was fined because he did not validate his ticket before entering the bus, although he had a valid transportation ticket. He was sued by the STIB before the local judge (Juge de paix). Is the processing of data of the users compliant with the GDPR ? The judge considered that the processing of the data of the users including the data on their journeys, even if stored in two separate databases, was not in line with the GDPR, because the explicit purposes were not determined in advance, and because the legal basis for doing so was not clear. As a consequence, the judge decided that the fine should not be paid.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 19A1286 in BE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

9 June 2020

Authority

DPA JugedePaixdeForest

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 19A1286 - Belgium (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: