Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Austrian Postal Service (fined controller) – Court Ruling (Austria, 2020)

Court Ruling
Datenschutzbehörde26 November 2020Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Austrian Postal Service appealed a fine related to data processing but the court ruled that the authority must follow proper procedures before imposing fines. This is significant because it reinforces the need for due process in data protection enforcement.

What happened

The Austrian Postal Service challenged a fine imposed for unlawful data processing related to political party affinity.

Who was affected

The Austrian Postal Service, which was fined for data processing violations.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the data protection authority must establish culpable conduct before imposing fines on legal entities.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent that emphasizes the importance of following legal procedures in data protection cases, which can affect how fines are enforced in the future.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 9 GDPR
Art. 30 GDPR
Art. 35 GDPR
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 4(8) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 6(4) GDPR
Art. 83(4)(a) GDPR
Art. 83(5)(a) GDPR
Art. 83(8) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Art. 4(8) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 6(4) GDPR
Art. 9(GDPR)
Art. 30(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)
Art. 83(4)(a) GDPR
Art. 83(5)(a) GDPR
Art. 83(8) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 133(4) Federal Constitution (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz - B-VG)
§ 1 Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG)
§ 30 Austrian Data Protection (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG)
§ 44a Austrian Adminstrative Penal Act (Verwaltungsstrafgesetz - VStG)
§ 45(1) Austrian Adminstrative Penal Act (Verwaltungsstrafgesetz - VStG)
Decision AuthorityBVwG
Reviewed AuthorityDSB (Austria)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 17 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, amount discrepancy.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The facts and cirumstances that lead to the fine can be read in the summary of BVwG - W258 2217446-1, another decision of the Austrian Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht - BVwG) dealing with different legal issues of the same case. Based on the unlawful processing of data on the "affinity for a political party", the DSB imposed a 18 Mio Euro fine on the Austrian Postal Service. In detail, the DSB held the Austrian Postal Service responsible for violating *Article 5(1) GDPR *Article 6 (1) GDPR *Article 6(4) GDPR *Article 9 GDPR *Article 14 GDPR *Article 30 GDPR *Article 35 GDPR and *Article 36 GDPR. The fine was issued directly against the Austrian Postal Service as controller under Article 4(7) GDPR without establishing culpable conduct of natural persons acting on behalf of the Austrian Postal Service. Based on this omission, the Austrian Postal service appealed against the fine. Can the DSB impose a fine under Article 83 GDPR directly on a legal person, without having to investigate and establish culpable conduct of natural persons acting on behalf of the legal person? Are the national rules of administrative penal law of any relevance to this question or is it to be answered solely under the rules of the GDPR? The BVwG held that the provisions of the Austrian Administrative Penal Act (Verwaltungsstrafgesetz - VStG) and the Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) apply on fines imposed by the DSB under Article 83 GDPR: Pursuant to Article 83(8) GDPR, the exercise by the supervisory authority of its powers under Article 83 GDPR shall be subject to appropriate procedural safeguards in accordance with Union and Member State law, including effective judicial remedy and due process. In light of this provision, the BVwG held, that national procedural rules are in fact to be applied when imposing a fine for a GDPR violation. According to the BVwG, the DSB had violated § 44a and § 45 VStG and § 30 DSG by not establishing culpable con

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Austrian Postal Service (fined controller) in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

26 November 2020

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Austrian Postal Service (fined controller) - Austria (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: