- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
Court case 18 U 5493/19 Pre – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court in Germany ruled that Facebook can require users to use their real names on their platform. This matters because it shows that social media companies can enforce rules to prevent fake accounts, which helps keep the platform safer for everyone.
What happened
Facebook blocked a user's account for not changing her pseudonym to a real name.
Who was affected
The user who created her Facebook account under a pseudonym and had it blocked.
What the authority found
The court decided that Facebook is allowed to require users to use their real names to prevent misuse.
Why this matters
This ruling highlights that social media platforms can enforce real-name policies. Other platforms may need to consider their own identity verification practices.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The plaintiff's was a user account on the Facebook platform. She created her user account under a pseudonym. Facebook blocked her user account after the plaintiff had not complied with the defendant's request to change her profile name for a clear name. The plaintiff asserted claims against the defendant for the activation of her user account created under the pseudonym, as well as claims for damages and pre-judicial lawyer's fees. The Regional Court in Ingolstadt granted the action only with regard to the activation of the plaintiff's user account plus pro rata pre-judicial lawyer's fees and otherwise dismissed the action. Both parties filed an appeal against this judgement. Was it legitimate for the operator of the social network platform to ask for the user's clear name? On appeal by the defendant, the Higher Regional Court amended the final judgment of the Regional Court of Ingolstadt of 13 September 2019, Case No. 31 O 227/18, to the effect that the action was dismissed in its entirety. The Higher Regional Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal. The Higher Regional Court in Munich held that the operator of a social network is entitled, in order to prevent unlawful conduct by its users, to require the use of clear names and to block the user account in the event of violations of this obligation.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 18 U 5493/19 Pre in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
8 December 2020
Authority
DPA LGIngolstadt
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 18 U 5493/19 Pre - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: