- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
UBER B.V. – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court found that Uber did not fully comply with requests from drivers for access to their personal data. This is important because it emphasizes the rights of individuals to access their information held by companies.
What happened
Uber provided incomplete data files to drivers who requested access to their personal information.
Who was affected
The drivers who requested their personal data from Uber were affected.
What the authority found
The court determined that Uber did not adequately fulfill the drivers' requests for complete access to their personal data as required by GDPR.
Why this matters
This case underscores the importance of transparency and data access rights for individuals. Companies must ensure they provide complete and understandable information when requested.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 17 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The 10 plaintiffs are or were engaged to drive with the app of the defendant, Uber, in the United Kingdom. The plaintiffs are part of the App for Drivers and Couriers Union (ADCU) which protects their interests as private drivers and couriers in the UK. ADCU is itself a member of International Alliance of App Transport Workers (IAATW). ADCU and IAATW want to create a database of the personal information of drivers at Uber. The plaintiffs have made requests by email or via the Uber Driver App to access the data processed by Uber concerning them. Uber provided digital files in response to these requests. The plaintiffs asked the court to review the digital files provided and to order Uber to provide explanation on a series of questions relating to the files given. The plaintiffs claimed that the files given were not complete as the data given did not contain the full information that they were entitled to. The plaintiffs also claimed that the decision was automated within the scope of Article 22 and therefore Article 15(1)(h) applies. They also claimed to have a right to data portability under Article 20(1) GDPR and that information should be provided in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format. They claim that Uber only provided a small part of the data in the required format. The plaintiffs asked the court to order Uber to: I. a) provide, within one month of notification and in a standard electronic form, access to: (i) personal data which Uber processes, such as the "Driver’s Profile" including the records of Uber employees, "Tags", and "Report", (ii) the purposes for processing, the categories of personal data, recipients or categories of recipients to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed, in particular recipients in third countries or international organisations and the storage period (iii) in the event of transfer to a third country or to an international organisation; the appropriate safeguards applied by Uber pursuant to art
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for UBER B.V. in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
11 March 2021
Authority
DPA RbAmsterdam
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. UBER B.V. - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: