Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

UBER B.V. – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA RbAmsterdam11 March 2021Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court found that Uber did not fully comply with requests from drivers for access to their personal data. This is important because it emphasizes the rights of individuals to access their information held by companies.

What happened

Uber provided incomplete data files to drivers who requested access to their personal information.

Who was affected

The drivers who requested their personal data from Uber were affected.

What the authority found

The court determined that Uber did not adequately fulfill the drivers' requests for complete access to their personal data as required by GDPR.

Why this matters

This case underscores the importance of transparency and data access rights for individuals. Companies must ensure they provide complete and understandable information when requested.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 15 GDPR
Art. 20 GDPR
Art. 22 GDPR
Art. 35 GDPR
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 4(4) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 12(6) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(h) GDPR
Art. 15(4) GDPR
Art. 20(1) GDPR
Art. 22(3) GDPR
Art. 41(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 4(4) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 12(3) GDPR
Art. 12(6) GDPR
Art. 15(GDPR)
Art. 15(1)(h) GDPR
Art. 15(1) GDPR
Art. 15(4) GDPR
Art. 20(GDPR)
Art. 20(1) GDPR
Art. 22(GDPR)
Art. 22(3) GDPR
Art. 35(GDPR)
Art. 41(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 3(1) Rome I Regulation
Article 4 Brussels I (Recast) Regulation
Decision AuthorityRb. Amsterdam

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 17 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The 10 plaintiffs are or were engaged to drive with the app of the defendant, Uber, in the United Kingdom. The plaintiffs are part of the App for Drivers and Couriers Union (ADCU) which protects their interests as private drivers and couriers in the UK. ADCU is itself a member of International Alliance of App Transport Workers (IAATW). ADCU and IAATW want to create a database of the personal information of drivers at Uber. The plaintiffs have made requests by email or via the Uber Driver App to access the data processed by Uber concerning them. Uber provided digital files in response to these requests. The plaintiffs asked the court to review the digital files provided and to order Uber to provide explanation on a series of questions relating to the files given. The plaintiffs claimed that the files given were not complete as the data given did not contain the full information that they were entitled to. The plaintiffs also claimed that the decision was automated within the scope of Article 22 and therefore Article 15(1)(h) applies. They also claimed to have a right to data portability under Article 20(1) GDPR and that information should be provided in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format. They claim that Uber only provided a small part of the data in the required format. The plaintiffs asked the court to order Uber to: I. a) provide, within one month of notification and in a standard electronic form, access to: (i) personal data which Uber processes, such as the "Driver’s Profile" including the records of Uber employees, "Tags", and "Report", (ii) the purposes for processing, the categories of personal data, recipients or categories of recipients to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed, in particular recipients in third countries or international organisations and the storage period (iii) in the event of transfer to a third country or to an international organisation; the appropriate safeguards applied by Uber pursuant to art

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for UBER B.V. in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

11 March 2021

Authority

DPA RbAmsterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. UBER B.V. - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: