Court case 2 LB 565/17 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA OVGGreifswald7 July 2020Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A German court decided that a member of a hunting cooperative could access the group's records to verify his share of income. This case highlights the balance between privacy and the right to information within organizations.

What happened

A member of a hunting cooperative was granted access to the group's records to check his income share.

Who was affected

Members of a hunting cooperative who need access to records to verify their income shares.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the member had the right to access the cooperative's records to exercise his membership rights effectively.

Why this matters

This decision shows that organizations must provide members access to certain records for transparency and accountability. It underscores the need for clear policies on information access while respecting privacy.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Decision AuthorityOVG Greifswald
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff would like to inspect the defendant's hunting register, a hunting cooperative. The plaintiff is a member of the defendant. The plaintiff based his claim on the necessity of being able to verify compliance with the corresponding distribution key in view of his claim to payment of the share of the income from the hunting lease to which he was entitled. Furthermore, he stated that he could only meaningfully exercise his membership rights in knowledge of the other members of the Hunting Cooperative. Finally, the plaintiff referred to the Freedom of Information Act of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. The defendant refused the requested access in order to protect the personal data of the other members of the hunting cooperative, who would refise to have their addresses published. Nor could it be seen why the plaintiff needed the data in order to be able to assert its claim for a pro rata payment of the defendant's earnings. A member of a hunting cooperative has a claim against the hunting cooperative to inspect the current hunting cadastre of the hunting cooperative, insofar as this contains the names, addresses and size of the areas of the individual hunting companions If these claims cannot be excluded obviously and unambiguously, the Hunting Cooperative owes the hunting companion disclosure of its books and other documents. The type and scope of the documents to which this disclosure extends in detail depends largely on the data required for the effective verification of the respective claim prerequisite The plaintiff is therefore entitled to inspect the hunting cadastre of the defendant, as far as the names of the other hunting companions contained therein, their addresses as well as the information on the size of the respective property areas of the individual owners are concerned. Only on the basis of this information can he effectively exercise his rights as a member of the Hunting Cooperative and thus as part of the General Meeting. It must be possible f

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 2 LB 565/17 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

7 July 2020

Authority

DPA OVGGreifswald

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 2 LB 565/17 - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: