- Enforcing jurisdiction
- France · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Marie CITRINI in her capacity as user representative on the AP-HP Supervisory Board – Court Ruling (France, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A French court ruled that the use of Doctolib for managing COVID-19 vaccine appointments did not violate data protection laws. This matters because it reassures users that their health data is being handled securely.
What happened
The court examined whether Doctolib's use of Amazon Web Services for data storage complied with data protection standards.
Who was affected
Individuals eligible for COVID-19 vaccinations in France were indirectly affected.
What the authority found
The court determined that the data protection measures in place were adequate and did not violate GDPR.
Why this matters
This ruling sets a precedent for how health data can be managed during emergencies, emphasizing the importance of proper data protection practices even when using third-party services.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
In the emergency context of COVID-19 vaccination, the Ministry of Solidarity and Health entrusted the management of vaccine appointments on the Internet to various service providers, including the company Doctolib. Several associations including Interhop asked the interim relief judge to suspend the partnership with the Doctolib company insofar as the data collected was stored on an American company (Amazon Web Services or AWS), transfering data outside the EU non compliant with the GDPR. *Does Doctolib provide an adequate level of data protection when using Amazon Web Services? *Has the state sufficiently fulfilled its duty of care for the health data of the data subjects? It was held that no health data was provided other than certifying being eligible for priority vaccination. Additionally, it was considered by the Court the fact that Doctolib using the hosting services of AWS Luxembourg, whose data centres are based in France and in Germany. Considering the existence of legal safeguards, an addendum to AWS Ireland contract that no data would be transferred to the US and requests of access would be denied, and a technical safeguards entailing encryption of the data with a key held by a trusted third party in France, so that AWS does not have access to the data and the data being deleted after three months or at any time at the request of individuals, the Court considered that the level of protection in this context could not be regarded as manifestly inadequate. The Court therefore considered that in this specific context, data are not being transferred to the US. The application is therefore rejected by the Conseil d'État.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Marie CITRINI in her capacity as user representative on the AP-HP Supervisory Board in FR
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
12 March 2021
Authority
DPA CE
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Marie CITRINI in her capacity as user representative on the AP-HP Supervisory Board - France (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: