- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case ROT 19/3036 – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court in the Netherlands ruled that a company did not violate privacy laws when it shared personal data with a service provider for membership management. The court found that the company had a valid reason for processing the user's data and complied with the user's requests. This decision highlights the importance of having a clear legal basis for sharing data.
What happened
The court ruled that a company shared personal data with DEX Online Services without violating privacy laws.
Who was affected
The ruling affected a user whose personal data was shared with DEX Online Services for membership administration.
What the authority found
The court decided that the company had a valid legal basis for processing the user's personal data and complied with their requests for removal.
Why this matters
This case shows that companies can share data with service providers if they have a valid reason. It reminds businesses to ensure they have proper legal grounds when handling personal data.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The controller engaged DEX Online Services to automate its membership administration, which contained personal data of the plaintiff. He also offered its members the opportunity to use the Yogibit app to gain access to their own data, so that they can, for example, deregister and register for lessons. On January 30, 2019, the plaintiff filed a complaint with the Dutch DPA against the controller. The DPA rejected the complaint by decision of 27 February 2019, because it found no obvious violation of the GDPR . Plaintiff has objected to this rejection. According to the DPA, both the controller and DEX Online Services have complied with the claimant's request for removal within the meaning of Article 17 of the GDPR. The controller has a valid basis for the processing of the plaintiff's personal data and it has not been shown that his personal data has been processed in the YogiBit app. In appeal, the plaintiff argues that the controller should have first explicitly requested permission from him before his personal data would be provided to DEX Online Services. According to the plaintiff, the defendant has forgotten to look at the definition of 'consent', as set out in Article 4 (11) of the GDPR . Additionally, it was not necessary for the controller to enable DEX Online Services for its student administration. According to the plaintiff, the controller could also have chosen to hire a secretary. In addition, the plaintiff stated that as a free EU citizen he has the right to choose whether he wants to go along with the choice of the controller for that third party. Plaintiff argued that it was up to DEX Online Services to ascertain that the controller complied with the conditions set out in Article 6 of the GDPR . In his view, on the basis of Article 5(2) GDPR the controller has an accountability obligation and must be able to demonstrate compliance with Article 5, first paragraph, of the GDPR . The plaintiff argued that the decision did not provide evidence of such com
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case ROT 19/3036 in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
19 March 2021
Authority
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case ROT 19/3036 - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: