Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case VerfGH Lv 15/20 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA OVGSaarland28 August 2020Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Constitutional Court of Saarland in Germany ruled that the collection of contact tracing data during the pandemic must be regulated by law, not just government decree. This decision is significant because it protects individuals' privacy rights against excessive data collection.

What happened

The court decided that contact tracing data collection for public health cannot be enforced solely by government decree.

Who was affected

The ruling affects citizens who may be required to provide personal information for contact tracing purposes.

What the authority found

The court found that such serious interference with privacy rights requires a parliamentary law, not just a temporary government regulation.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the need for legal frameworks to protect privacy rights, especially during health crises. Businesses should be cautious about how they collect and store customer data.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 6(3) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(d) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 6(3) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Art. 2 § 3 CP-VO (Verordnung zur Änderung infektionsrechtlicher Verordnungen zur Bekämpfung der Corona-Pandemie vom 8. August 2020)
§ 32 IfSG in conjunction with § 28 IfSG (Gesetz zur Verhütung und Bekämpfung von Infektionskrankheiten beim Menschen)
Decision AuthorityVerfGH Saarland
Reviewed AuthorityOVG Saarland (Germany)

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

In the Saarland, Art. 2 § 3 CP-VO regulated contact tracing. This tracing serves to interrupt chains of infection. The aim is to find out who may have had close contact with an infected person so that he/she can be placed in (self-)quarantine and tested in order to avoid infecting other people unintentionally. Those responsible for catering, cultural facilities and events, indoor playgrounds, church services and funerals, sports and other related events according to Art. 2 § 6 CP-VO, hotels and other accommodation providers as well as prostitution businesses are obliged to do to keep the information: - First name and surname, - Place of residence - Accessibility and - the arrival time of one representative of each household present They must be handed over to the health authorities on request. It is also provided that these data are to be deleted within one month. The standard does not lay down any requirements for the organisation of the collection of contact data. In the field of gastronomy, in particular, this often leads to the fact that subsequent guests can recognise and remember who has visited the company before them and how they can be reached via telephone number, e-mail address or postal address. This is a significant interference in the right to data protection. By recording, storing and possibly also passing on address and contact data, citizens - holders of fundamental rights - could be indirectly deterred from attending certain events or places. Indeed, the idea can be frightening if it is precisely documented and, if necessary, the state is informed from when to when one has visited which restaurant, political, religious or cultural event. According to the Constitutional Court of the Saarland, such a far-reaching, serious interference with the fundamental right to data protection cannot be decided by government decree. A parliamentary law is also necessary, because it is not (any longer) a short-term emergency situation, but a regulation which i

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case VerfGH Lv 15/20 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

28 August 2020

Authority

DPA OVGSaarland

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case VerfGH Lv 15/20 - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: