Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

COOPERATIVE RABOBANK UA – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA RbLimburg4 September 2020Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled on a complaint against COOPERATIVE RABOBANK UA regarding the refusal to remove an arrears code from a customer's credit record after they paid off their debt. The court found that the bank must respect the customer's request unless it has strong reasons to keep the information. This case emphasizes the rights of individuals to manage their personal data.

What happened

Rabobank refused to remove an arrears code from a customer's credit record after the debt was paid.

Who was affected

The customer who requested the removal of the arrears code from their credit record.

What the authority found

The court ruled that Rabobank must honor the customer's request to remove the arrears code unless it can provide compelling reasons to keep it.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces the rights of individuals to control their personal data and highlights the need for organizations to respond to such requests appropriately.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 35 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 35(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityRb. Limburg

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The claimant was registered in the Central Credit Information System (hereinafter CKI) of the BKR (Credit Registration Office) because of two instances on which he had defaulted on repaying an overdraft. BKR then issued the claimant with a revolving credit, set to begin in 2012 and end in 2019, and visible until 2024. The registration of the revolving credit contained an arrears code (signalling that money is owed and should have been paid earlier) which would remain visible on his account until 2021. When the claimant paid back the full amount in 2020, he asked to have the arrear code removed from his file. Rabobank refused to remove the code, which led to the complainant filing a complaint. Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the GDPR, persons such as [the claimant] can object to the processing of their personal data on the basis of Article 6(1)(e) or (f) GDPR due to their specific situation . The controller, in this case Rabobank, must honor the objection, unless it submits compelling legitimate grounds for the processing that outweigh the interests, rights and freedoms of the persons concerned. If the objection is granted, the controller must delete the personal data without unreasonable delay. If the controller does not honor the objection, the data subject may, if necessary, ask the court for an effective remedy (Article 79 GDPR and Article 35 UAVG). The court assesses whether the controller has demonstrated that its compelling legitimate interests (in this case the dual purpose of the credit registration: to protect the consumer against excessive credit and to warn other credit institutions) in this specific case outweigh the interests or the fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject (recital 69 GDPR). Whether it was proportionate for the BKR registration to be maintained, given the fact that the claimant had paid back her arrear and the current registration was preventing her from taking out housing credit? After weighing up the interests involved, R

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for COOPERATIVE RABOBANK UA in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

4 September 2020

Authority

DPA RbLimburg

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. COOPERATIVE RABOBANK UA - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: