Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case c/13/673085 / HA ZA 19-340 – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA RbDenHaag2 April 2020Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that a person could not have a previous court decision deleted from a public website. The court stated that even if the person could be identified, the law requires that judicial decisions be publicly available. This case shows the limits of privacy rights when it comes to public legal decisions.

What happened

The court denied a request to delete a court decision from the website 'rechtspraak.nl' because it was published in line with legal obligations.

Who was affected

The individual who requested the deletion of the court decision was affected.

What the authority found

The court held that the individual could not have the information deleted due to the requirement for public access to judicial decisions.

Why this matters

This case illustrates that privacy rights may be limited in the context of public legal records. Website operators should be aware that certain information must remain accessible for legal transparency.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 17(3)(b) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 17(1) GDPR
Art. 17(3)(b) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 14(1) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Article 21 Dutch Basic Law (Grondwet)
Article 5(1) Dutch Law on the Organisation of the Judiciary Basic Law
Decision AuthorityRb. Amsterdam
Reviewed AuthorityRb. Den Haag (Netherlands)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The applicant requested to delete a previous court decision from the website "rechtspraak.nl" according to Article 17 (1) GDPR, because the applicant claims that he/she could be identified by it and therefore creates a reason to deport him/her. The issue in this case is whether the State is obliged to remove, in whole or in part, the judment of 28 June 2019 of the District Court of The Hague, published in accordance with the anonymisation guidelines, from www.rechtspraak.nl. The court hold that to the extent that the applicant is reasonably identifiable person the applicant cannot obtain the deletion of the data referred to in Article 17 GDPR, because Article 17 (3) (b) GDPR precludes this. By publishing the decision, the District Court of The Hague fulfils its constitutional obligation that judicial decisions must be taken publicly (Article 6 (1) ECHR, Article 14(1) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 21 Dutch Basic Law and Article 5(1) of the Law on the Organisation of the Judiciary). Consequently, the applicant does not have the right to incorrect information under Article 17(1) GDPR.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case c/13/673085 / HA ZA 19-340 in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

2 April 2020

Authority

DPA RbDenHaag

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case c/13/673085 / HA ZA 19-340 - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: