- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case c/13/673085 / HA ZA 19-340 – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A court ruled that a person could not have a previous court decision deleted from a public website. The court stated that even if the person could be identified, the law requires that judicial decisions be publicly available. This case shows the limits of privacy rights when it comes to public legal decisions.
What happened
The court denied a request to delete a court decision from the website 'rechtspraak.nl' because it was published in line with legal obligations.
Who was affected
The individual who requested the deletion of the court decision was affected.
What the authority found
The court held that the individual could not have the information deleted due to the requirement for public access to judicial decisions.
Why this matters
This case illustrates that privacy rights may be limited in the context of public legal records. Website operators should be aware that certain information must remain accessible for legal transparency.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The applicant requested to delete a previous court decision from the website "rechtspraak.nl" according to Article 17 (1) GDPR, because the applicant claims that he/she could be identified by it and therefore creates a reason to deport him/her. The issue in this case is whether the State is obliged to remove, in whole or in part, the judment of 28 June 2019 of the District Court of The Hague, published in accordance with the anonymisation guidelines, from www.rechtspraak.nl. The court hold that to the extent that the applicant is reasonably identifiable person the applicant cannot obtain the deletion of the data referred to in Article 17 GDPR, because Article 17 (3) (b) GDPR precludes this. By publishing the decision, the District Court of The Hague fulfils its constitutional obligation that judicial decisions must be taken publicly (Article 6 (1) ECHR, Article 14(1) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 21 Dutch Basic Law and Article 5(1) of the Law on the Organisation of the Judiciary). Consequently, the applicant does not have the right to incorrect information under Article 17(1) GDPR.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case c/13/673085 / HA ZA 19-340 in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case c/13/673085 / HA ZA 19-340 - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: