The Executive of the Municipality of Etten-Leur ('het college van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Etten-Leur') – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Dutch court ruled that the Municipality of Etten-Leur did not have to delete a person's data from an online forum. The court found that sharing the data was part of the municipality's public duties and not unlawful. This decision highlights the balance between public access to information and privacy rights.
What happened
The court decided that the Municipality of Etten-Leur was not required to erase personal data shared on a municipal forum.
Who was affected
The person whose data was shared on the Association of Dutch Municipalities' forum.
What the authority found
The court found that the municipality's sharing of personal data was lawful under public access laws and did not require erasure.
Why this matters
This case shows that municipalities may share personal data as part of their public duties without breaching privacy laws. Website operators should understand when public interest might override privacy requests.
GDPR Articles Cited
National Law Articles
On the 17th July 2019, the claimant submitted a request to the defendant, the Board of the Municipality of Etten-Leur ('the Board'), demanding: * the erasure of his personal data, pursuant to Article 17 GDPR, which the Board had published on the Association of Dutch Municipalities ('VNG') forum - an online forum accessible to employees at other municipalities in the Netherlands. The claimant had learned that his personal data was published on the VNG forum via an access request submitted to the the Board. * damages on account of the fact that the Board had published his personal data on the forum, in accordance with Article 82 GDPR. The claimant considered €2,500 an appropriate amount. According to the claimant, the publication of his personal data on the VNG violated the principle of proportionality. Further, the claimant argued that the Board should not have shared his personal data in this way without his permission, and that it had no legal basis for such processing under Article 6 GDPR. The Board rejected the claimant's request for erasure. In particular, it argued that the claimant's request for erasure was fundamentally unfounded, as the publication of personal data on the VNG forum was not unlawful. It was therefore not obliged to erase the personal data in line with Article 17(d), nor was it obliged to provide the claimant damages. The claimant contested this decision. The Court declared the claimant's request for erasure unfounded, and rejected the request for damages. In particular, it referred to a [https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RVS:2020:898 decision by the Administrative Law Division of the Council of State ('AbRS') of 1 April 2020]. This decision highlighted that a municipal Board can be requested to disclose private information about an administrative matter falling under the Dutch Government Information (Public Access) Act ('Wob'), since the implementation of the Wob is a public law task of a municipal Board, and
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for The Executive of the Municipality of Etten-Leur ('het college van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Etten-Leur') in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. The Executive of the Municipality of Etten-Leur ('het college van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Etten-Leur') - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: