Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

VGZ – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA RbNoord-Holland25 May 2021Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that a pharmacy illegally published the names of two employees from a health insurance company in a newspaper. This decision is important because it reinforces the need for businesses to respect privacy when sharing information.

What happened

The pharmacy published personal details of health insurance employees without a legal basis.

Who was affected

The employees of VGZ whose names and work phone numbers were published in the pharmacy's advertisement.

What the authority found

The court decided that the pharmacy had no valid reason for sharing the employees' personal information, violating GDPR's privacy rules.

Why this matters

This case serves as a warning to businesses about the risks of sharing personal information. Companies must ensure they have a legal reason before disclosing any personal data.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityRb. Noord-Holland

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 17 March 2026.

Processing notes: authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

De 'Regenboog Apotheek' (Rainbow pharmacy) is a pharmacy which provides its patients with so-called 'tapering strips'. These strips are used when patients stop taking certain kinds of antidepressants and ADHD-medication, as suddenly stopping can cause severe withdrawal symptoms. Tapering strips need to be made by hand for individual patients, and are therefore expensive. Health insurance company VGZ refuses to pay for these strips despite insistence of the pharmacy that they are legally obliged to do so. This dispute has led to the termination of the contract between the Regenboog pharmacy and VGZ. The pharmacy then placed an ad in a local newspaper, informing their patients that they might need to switch to a different health insurance company. In this ad, the names and work telephone numbers of two employees (who work at the purchasing department of VGZ) were included. In a separate letter to all patients using ADHD-medication, this information was repeated. Was the pharmacy allowed to publish the names of employees of the purchasing department of the health insurance company? The Court ordered the publication of the personal details of the employees unlawful, as a legal basis was missing. The Regenboog pharmacy was ordered to send a follow-up letter to all patients who had illegally received personal details, pointing them to the general customer service number of VGZ.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for VGZ in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

25 May 2021

Authority

DPA RbNoord-Holland

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. VGZ - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: