Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.
Privacy topics

Unknown telecommunication carrier – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA RbRotterdam27 June 2021Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch telecommunications provider was fined for not sharing its customer database with authorities as required. This is significant because it shows that companies must comply with legal requests for data. It emphasizes the importance of transparency and cooperation with regulatory bodies.

What happened

The telecommunications provider failed to provide its customer database to the authorities as required.

Who was affected

The telecommunications provider and its customers were affected by this situation.

What the authority found

The Dutch Telecommunications Authority imposed a fine for non-compliance with data sharing requirements.

Why this matters

This ruling serves as a reminder for companies to comply with legal data requests. It underscores the need for businesses to maintain open lines of communication with authorities.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Bvgt
Decision AuthorityRb. Rotterdam

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, amount discrepancy, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Dutch Telecommunications Authority (Agentschap Telecom) fined an unidentified telecommunications provider for failing to make its customer database available to the authorities as required. The provider was fined €5000 and ordered to provide data on its customers to the authorities again. The provider was also threatened with further fines if it failed to comply in the future. According to the [https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0011123/2019-07-18 Dutch Decree on the Provision of Telecommunications Data] (Bvgt) and [https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3:c:BWBR0009950&hoofdstuk=13&artikel=13.4&z=2020-12-21&g=2020-12-21 Article 13.4 of the Telecommunications Act], telecommunications providers must connect to an automated system called CIS, which is operated by the Central Information Point for Investigation of Telecommunications (CIOT). The CIS acts as an automated middleman between telecom and internet providers, who must submit certain information, and government agencies, which can request information from the databases. Every 24 hours, service providers must provide an updated database of their clients via the CIS.https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/brochures/2010/07/01/factsheet-ciot/Informatieblad+CIOT.pdf Since 2013, the telecom provider had sought to obtain satisfactory answers to its questions and guarantees about the handling of the requested data before submitting the information. The telecommunications provider stopped providing data to CIS in the summer of 2016. The CIOT complained to Dutch Telecommunications Authority in December 2017 that the provider was not cooperative in providing information.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Unknown telecommunication carrier in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

27 June 2021

Authority

DPA RbRotterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Unknown telecommunication carrier - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: