Complainant – Court Ruling (Norway, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Norwegian court decided that Google did not have to remove search results about a person who was interviewed in his professional role. The court found that the public interest in the information outweighed the individual's request for removal. This case highlights the balance between personal privacy and public information.
What happened
A court ruled that Google did not have to delist search results about a person interviewed in a professional capacity.
Who was affected
The person interviewed in his role for a company, whose name appeared in Google search results.
What the authority found
The court decided that the search results should not be removed because the information was of public interest and not sensitive personal data.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that public interest can outweigh personal privacy requests, especially when the information is related to professional roles. Website operators should consider the context and public interest when handling similar requests.
GDPR Articles Cited
The complainant objected that when he searched for his name, search results concerning him were listed on Google. The search result linked to a news/consumer report where the complainant was interviewed in his role for a company he represented. The complainant filed a complaint with Datatilsynet, which rejected his complaint based on an assessment of the balancing of interests in Google's favour. The complainant then appealed the complaint to PVN. The PVN issued a split decision, where the majority agreed with Datatilsynet that the search result should not be delisted. In particular the following elements in the decision were emphasised: * None of the personal data concerned information covered by Article 9 or 10 GDPR. * The data subject was interviewed as part of his role in the business, and not as a private individual. * It had only been two years since the interview, and the data subject had the same role in the same company. * The interview gave a correct impression at the time it was published (though the company later won in court concerning the same case). Personvernnemda did not give the data subject's subjective feelings connected to the search result a decisive influence in the outcome.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Complainant in NO
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Complainant - Norway (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: