- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Norway · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Complainant – Court Ruling (Norway, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A complainant asked for Google to remove search results that showed his name linked to a news report. The court decided that Google did not need to remove the results because the information was relevant to his role in a company. This ruling is important because it shows that public interest can outweigh personal privacy in some cases.
What happened
The court ruled that Google should not remove search results linked to the complainant's name.
Who was affected
The complainant, who was featured in a news report while representing a company.
What the authority found
The court found that the search results did not violate privacy rules since the information was related to the complainant's professional role.
Why this matters
This case highlights the balance between privacy and public interest, indicating that information related to a person's professional role may remain accessible online. Website operators should be aware that not all personal data is entitled to removal.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The complainant objected that when he searched for his name, search results concerning him were listed on Google. The search result linked to a news/consumer report where the complainant was interviewed in his role for a company he represented. The complainant filed a complaint with Datatilsynet, which rejected his complaint based on an assessment of the balancing of interests in Google's favour. The complainant then appealed the complaint to PVN. The PVN issued a split decision, where the majority agreed with Datatilsynet that the search result should not be delisted. In particular the following elements in the decision were emphasised: * None of the personal data concerned information covered by Article 9 or 10 GDPR. * The data subject was interviewed as part of his role in the business, and not as a private individual. * It had only been two years since the interview, and the data subject had the same role in the same company. * The interview gave a correct impression at the time it was published (though the company later won in court concerning the same case). Personvernnemda did not give the data subject's subjective feelings connected to the search result a decisive influence in the outcome.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Complainant in NO
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
18 May 2021
Authority
Datatilsynet (Norway)
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Complainant - Norway (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: