Enforcing jurisdiction
Norway · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Complainant – Court Ruling (Norway, 2021)

Court Ruling
Datatilsynet (Norway)18 May 2021Norway
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A complainant asked for Google to remove search results that showed his name linked to a news report. The court decided that Google did not need to remove the results because the information was relevant to his role in a company. This ruling is important because it shows that public interest can outweigh personal privacy in some cases.

What happened

The court ruled that Google should not remove search results linked to the complainant's name.

Who was affected

The complainant, who was featured in a news report while representing a company.

What the authority found

The court found that the search results did not violate privacy rules since the information was related to the complainant's professional role.

Why this matters

This case highlights the balance between privacy and public interest, indicating that information related to a person's professional role may remain accessible online. Website operators should be aware that not all personal data is entitled to removal.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 21 GDPR
Art. 17(1)(c) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 17(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 21(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityPVN
Reviewed AuthorityDatatilsynet (Norway)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The complainant objected that when he searched for his name, search results concerning him were listed on Google. The search result linked to a news/consumer report where the complainant was interviewed in his role for a company he represented. The complainant filed a complaint with Datatilsynet, which rejected his complaint based on an assessment of the balancing of interests in Google's favour. The complainant then appealed the complaint to PVN. The PVN issued a split decision, where the majority agreed with Datatilsynet that the search result should not be delisted. In particular the following elements in the decision were emphasised: * None of the personal data concerned information covered by Article 9 or 10 GDPR. * The data subject was interviewed as part of his role in the business, and not as a private individual. * It had only been two years since the interview, and the data subject had the same role in the same company. * The interview gave a correct impression at the time it was published (though the company later won in court concerning the same case). Personvernnemda did not give the data subject's subjective feelings connected to the search result a decisive influence in the outcome.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Complainant in NO

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

18 May 2021

Authority

Datatilsynet (Norway)

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Complainant - Norway (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: