Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Unknown applicant – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA RbAmsterdam22 April 2021Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in the Netherlands ruled on a case involving a bank that reported a customer to a credit registry despite a special repayment agreement. The court found that the bank's actions were not justified and negatively impacted the customer's ability to obtain new loans. This ruling highlights the need for banks to accurately report customer information.

What happened

Rabobank reported a customer to a credit registry even after agreeing to a special repayment plan.

Who was affected

The customer who was negatively affected by the bank's reporting to the credit registry.

What the authority found

The court ruled that Rabobank's reporting was unjustified and harmed the customer's financial opportunities.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that banks must be careful and fair in how they report customer information. It sets a precedent for ensuring accurate credit reporting practices.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 21 GDPR
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 79 GDPR
Art. 35(2) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 21(GDPR)
Art. 35(2) GDPR
Art. 79(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 35(2) UAVG
Article 4:32 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wft)
Article 4:34 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wft)
Decision AuthorityRb. Amsterdam

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Whenever a consumer in the Netherlands obtains credit, the debt must be registered in a central register of the foundation Bureau Krediet Registratie (BKR). The case at hand involved a person with whom the bank, Rabobank, had made a special agreement. He was to pay part of a loan and was forgiven the repayment of a remaining part of the loan. After he had paid the amount agreed with the bank, Rabobank nevertheless reported him to the BKR register with a special code. This prevented him from taking out new loans, even though he was in a good financial situation. For this reason, he took the matter to court. The claimant had two mortgages on two homes with his ex-partner. Following the couple's divorce, they were forced to sell both houses. After the houses had been sold in 2015 and 2016, a residual debt of €119,979 remained. The partners were jointly responsible for the full repayment of the debt. Almost immediately after the sale of the first home, the applicant voluntarily started repaying the remaining debt at the rate of €500 per month. In November 2015, the applicant's 7 monthly repayments totalled €3500. In February 2017, Rabobank sent a letter to the applicant. The bank had calculated that the applicant could repay €1486 per month, but that this would not enable him to repay the entire debt within 5 years. The bank offered him alternative payment models; if he accepted the special arrangement, he would not have to repay the entire remaining debt. The applicant and the bank agreed that the applicant would pay €1388.89 per month for 36 months (€50,000 in total) and that the bank would pay €62,015.83. It was also agreed that the €3500 that the applicant had already paid would be deducted from the amount that the applicant owed. The applicant fully complied with the payment plan and repaid the debt between September 2017 and May 2020. On 29 May 2020, Rabobank registered the applicant in the BKR's Central Credit Information System with a special code of 3. This c

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Unknown applicant in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

22 April 2021

Authority

DPA RbAmsterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Unknown applicant - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: