Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case 11 O 1741/18 UWG – Court Ruling (Germany, 2018)

Court Ruling
DPA LGWrzburg13 September 2018Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Germany ruled that a lawyer's website did not meet GDPR requirements because it lacked necessary information about data processing. This is significant because it shows that even small business websites must comply with data protection laws.

What happened

The court prohibited the lawyer from using her website without a proper data protection declaration.

Who was affected

Visitors to the lawyer's website who were not informed about data processing practices.

What the authority found

The court decided that the lawyer's website violated unfair competition laws by not providing required data protection information.

Why this matters

This ruling serves as a reminder for all website operators to ensure their sites comply with data protection regulations. Failing to provide clear information can lead to legal issues.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 13 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 13(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 3 a UWG
§ 4 (11) UWG
§ 8 (3) UWG
§ 12 (2) UWG
§ 14 (2) UWG
Decision AuthorityLG Würzburg

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The defendant was a lawyer who ran her website. The applicant alleged that the website was not adapted to the requirements of the GDPR, because it did not contain all the legally required information about the processing of personal data (currently resulting from Article 13 GDPR). In addition, it violated the law on unfair competition (the applicant was also a lawyer). The Court prohibited the defendant from using her unencrypted website, related to her activity as a lawyer, without a data protection declaration compliant with the GDPR. The Court found that the defendant's action violates unfair competition laws.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 11 O 1741/18 UWG in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

13 September 2018

Authority

DPA LGWrzburg

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 11 O 1741/18 UWG - Germany (2018). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: