Enforcing jurisdiction
Belgium · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (Data Protection Authority) – Court Ruling (Belgium, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA CourtofAppealofBruss7 October 2021Belgium
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A shop owner required customers to show their electronic ID to join a loyalty program, which led to a complaint. The Supreme Court ruled that this practice could violate data protection rules, emphasizing that consent must be freely given and not tied to losing benefits.

What happened

The Supreme Court annulled a previous decision that found the shop owner's ID requirement for loyalty cards was excessive.

Who was affected

The customer who refused to provide their electronic ID to join the loyalty program.

What the authority found

The Supreme Court decided that the shop owner did not properly consider whether requiring an ID violated data protection principles.

Why this matters

This ruling stresses that businesses must ensure their data collection practices are fair and proportional. Companies should review their consent processes to avoid similar issues.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Art. 57(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(11) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 57(1)(f) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthoritySupreme Court
Reviewed AuthorityCourt of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A shop owner tied admission to a loyalty scheme to the presentation of an eID (i.e. a Belgian electronic identity card). A data subject refused to provide his eID, considering that such data processing was excessive and not proportionate when taking into account the purpose of the processing. The data subject further filed a complaint before the Belgian DPA (APD/GBA) for being deprived of the advantages conferred by the loyalty scheme. On 17 September 2019, the Belgian DPA fined the shop owner for requiring customers to present their eID in order to obtain a loyalty card and imposed a fine of €10,000. The shop owner appealed that decision. The imposed fine of €10,000 was later annulled by the Court of Appeal of Brussels, because (i) the new eID legislation could not be applied retroactively ; (ii) the fine was not sufficiently justified and (iii) the data linked to the eID of the Complainant had actually not been processed by the shop owner, since the data subject had refused to provide such eID. The Belgian DPA contested the legality of such a decision before the Supreme Court of Belgium. The Supreme Court annulled the decision of the Court of Appeal of Brussels because it considered that the Court of Appeal did not correctly apply the law. The Supreme Court considered in particular that the Court of Appeal of Brussels erred in law by not properly considering whether the compulsory reading of an identity card as the only mean of creating a customer loyalty card is contrary to the principle of data minimisation under Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, and contrary to the obligation to obtain the freely given consent of the data subject under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, when refusal to provide such data results into a disadvantage for the data subject (such as not being able to obtain discounts). The Supreme Court stated that the Court of Appeal should have considered the loss of an advantage in assessing whether consent is freely given under GDPR. It also confirmed that the Belgi

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (Data Protection Authority) in BE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

7 October 2021

Authority

DPA CourtofAppealofBruss

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (Data Protection Authority) - Belgium (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: