Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 29 K 7031/19 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2021)

Court Ruling
DPA VGDsseldorf11 October 2021Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A person complained that a court shared his investigation files with journalists without permission. The data protection authority said it couldn't help because courts are mostly exempt from their oversight. This case highlights the limits of data protection laws when it comes to judicial processes.

What happened

A court allegedly shared a person's investigation files with journalists without consent.

Who was affected

The individual who was investigated for tax evasion and whose personal data was shared.

What the authority found

The data protection authority ruled it could not intervene since courts are largely exempt from its scrutiny.

Why this matters

This case shows the challenges in protecting personal data in legal settings. It reminds individuals to be aware of how their data might be handled in court cases.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
View original scraped data
Art. 77(GDPR)
Art. 78(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 25 DSG NRW a. F.
Decision AuthorityVG Düsseldorf

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The applicant complained to the DPA of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (the LDI) about the actions of the District Court of C. He worked for several decades as a civilian employee for the police authorities and intelligence services. In 2016, he was charged with tax evasion by the District Court of C. and eventually was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment. Following an appeal, the case was referred back to this Court. The proceedings there are still ongoing and are currently suspended. The complainant argued that apparently the investigation file, which had been received by the Court, together with the indictment, had been copied in full or at least a substantial part and distributed to third parties. These parties included journalists of the T. Zeitung (Z), who had reported on the allegations against the applicant in their articles before the case was known to the public. Moreover, the day before the opening of the main hearing, the newspaper again carried an extensive report using personal data from the indictment. Further letters also showed that Z had knowledge of the contents of the criminal case file. The complainant, by letter dated 15 December 2017, requested the DPA, to take measures against the District Court of C., i.e., to prohibit the Court from transferring the judicial files concerning him in whole or in part to the press authorities or to reconstruct the criminal file for that purpose. In response, in early 2018, the DPA replied that courts are largely exempt from scrutiny by the DPA. The inadmissible disclosure of court records falls within the field of jurisdiction or justice, not administrative action. Consequently, the DPA was unable to provide assistance within the scope of its competence. The authority in its letter did not indicate to the claimant how he could appeal against this position. One and a half years later - in September 2019 - the complainant filed a lawsuit requesting the enforcement of the GDPR by the LDI, namel

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 29 K 7031/19 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

11 October 2021

Authority

DPA VGDsseldorf

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 29 K 7031/19 - Germany (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: