- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Personal Data Authority – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Dutch court ruled that a person's privacy was not violated when they had to buy a bus ticket only by card, not cash. The court found that there was a valid contract when the person boarded the bus, even if they didn't have a choice of provider. This decision is important for understanding how contracts and privacy rights work together.
What happened
A person appealed a decision stating that they could only buy a bus ticket with a card instead of cash.
Who was affected
The person who wanted to buy a bus ticket but felt their privacy was violated by the cash payment ban.
What the authority found
The court decided that the processing of personal data was necessary for the contract when the person boarded the bus, and that there was no violation of privacy.
Why this matters
This ruling clarifies that companies can require certain payment methods without violating privacy rights. It highlights the importance of understanding how contracts can affect user choices.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 17 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
This matter concerns an appeal to the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State in which the data subject stated that his right to privacy was violated by the fact that he could only purchase a bus ticket by card (as opposed to cash payment). He previously raised a request to the AP (the DPA) to take action against Connexxion Openbaar Vervoer N.V. for the decision to abolish cash payments, through application of the GDPR. This request was denied and underlies the current appeal. On appeal, the data subject argued that “the court erred in finding that the processing of personal data is necessary for the performance of a contract” in that: 1. The data subject did not enter into an agreement with Connexxion “of his own free will” and that consent for the processing of his personal data was not given freely and unambiguously as Connexxion has a monopoly on which public transport users depend. He argued that the General Conditions for City and Regional Transport 2015 are insufficient to serve as a legal basis within the meaning of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR. 2. The purpose of the data processing is not well-defined, explicit and justified. 3. The effect on safety of banning cash payments is not clear as this measure is one of a group consisting of 23 measures. In establishing which data is being processed, the Court took note of the fact that Connexxion uses a Payment Service Provider (PSP) to process its financial transactions and applies the PAN Masking technique to secure these transactions. This technique only provides the last four digits of the bank account number to be stored at Connexxion while the preceding digits are anonymized. The Court further noted that a contract is established when the passenger boards the bus and the mere fact that the passenger has no choice as to whom he concludes this contract with does not negate the existence of said contract. It went on to consider whether there is an agreement in place and held that “there is no ev
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Personal Data Authority in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
10 November 2021
Authority
DPA RbGelderland
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Personal Data Authority - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: